| Discussion Topic |
Replies (estimated) |
Archive Link
|
| This is not a radical rewrite of policy |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#This is not a radical rewrite of policy
|
| Primary/Secondary Mess |
42 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Primary/Secondary Mess
|
| Explanation |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Explanation
|
| Comments |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Comments
|
| Original research definition |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Original research definition
|
| Some key terms section |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Some key terms section
|
| Nutshell |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Nutshell
|
| Sourcing and notability |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Sourcing and notability
|
| Secondary and Tertiary sources |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Secondary and Tertiary sources
|
| Primary sources and articles in scientific journals |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Primary sources and articles in scientific journals
|
| Self-published sources section |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Self-published sources section
|
| section heading |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#section heading
|
| Primary sources |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Primary sources
|
| Material for which no reliable published source could be found |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Material for which no reliable published source could be found
|
| But brevity |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#But brevity
|
| Scientific controversies |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Scientific controversies
|
| WP:NOR |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#WP:NOR
|
| wherever possible? what about when not possible? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#wherever possible? what about when not possible?
|
| WP:NOT |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#WP:NOT
|
| Clarification |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Clarification
|
| Fact vs opinion |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Fact vs opinion
|
| Bible examples |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Bible examples
|
| What is not original research |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#What is not original research
|
| Foreign-language sources |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Foreign-language sources
|
| do not delete ... "historical" it |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#do not delete ... "historical" it
|
| Why the extra rules for deceased people? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Why the extra rules for deceased people?
|
| "Could be attributed" + NOR |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#"Could be attributed" + NOR
|
| Acceptable sources |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Acceptable sources
|
| Policy vs. guideline |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Policy vs. guideline
|
| Primary vs secondary sources |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Primary vs secondary sources
|
| Interesting |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Interesting
|
| What's the improvement? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#What's the improvement?
|
| original research section |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#original research section
|
| Websites |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Websites
|
| Some issues with this page |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Some issues with this page
|
| Bloat danger |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Bloat danger
|
| Acceptable vs. Reliable |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Acceptable vs. Reliable
|
| This is an unnecessary and harmful change |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#This is an unnecessary and harmful change
|
| Another key principle |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Another key principle
|
| Separating the basic original research |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Separating the basic original research
|
| Reliable sources section |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Reliable sources section
|
| Popular culture section |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Popular culture section
|
| No original research |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#No original research
|
| Tinkering with problematic sources |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Tinkering with problematic sources
|
| Reviewed and recommended section |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Reviewed and recommended section
|
| Broadening the popular culture exception |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Broadening the popular culture exception
|
| Unacceptable sources |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Unacceptable sources
|
| Problematic sources |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Problematic sources
|
| Self-published sources |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Self-published sources
|
| Self-published sources in articles about "themselves" |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Self-published sources in articles about "themselves"
|
| remove of OR example |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#remove of OR example
|
| The foundation concept of attribution |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#The foundation concept of attribution
|
| Extremists |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Extremists
|
| The "synthesis" section |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#The "synthesis" section
|
| Popular culture |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Popular culture
|
| Strange Removal... |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Strange Removal...
|
| Added section on conflicting sources |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Added section on conflicting sources
|
| Publication and archaic works |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1#Publication and archaic works
|
| "Trivial" |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#"Trivial"
|
| Added meat to (previously empty) "Citing sources" section |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Added meat to (previously empty) "Citing sources" section
|
| Better phrase for unoriginal research |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Better phrase for unoriginal research
|
| How to format citations |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#How to format citations
|
| Wikipedia:Attribution/FAQ |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Wikipedia:Attribution/FAQ
|
| Reference standards |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Reference standards
|
| A B C |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#A B C
|
| Old popular culture section |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Old popular culture section
|
| We need better wording for what is a source |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#We need better wording for what is a source
|
| Avoid "prematurely removing material for which reliable sources could reasonably be found" |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Avoid "prematurely removing material for which reliable sources could reasonably be found"
|
| Basic Principles |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Basic Principles
|
| Please reread what we have now |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Please reread what we have now
|
| Must vs should |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Must vs should
|
| Impetus behind this proposal |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Impetus behind this proposal
|
| Design freeze? |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Design freeze?
|
| FAQ |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#FAQ
|
| Applying this policy |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Applying this policy
|
| A few questions about application |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#A few questions about application
|
| This policy proposal is not designed to substitute for thinking |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#This policy proposal is not designed to substitute for thinking
|
| Popular culture again |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Popular culture again
|
| Anti-religious, racist |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Anti-religious, racist
|
| Questionable sources should usually not be used... |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#Questionable sources should usually not be used...
|
| A hypothetical case |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 2#A hypothetical case
|
| Popular Culture (yet again) |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#Popular Culture (yet again)
|
| Perhaps the relevant criteria for the popular culture thing |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#Perhaps the relevant criteria for the popular culture thing
|
| Expert self-published |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#Expert self-published
|
| The best sources |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#The best sources
|
| "Material challenged or likely to be challenged"? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#"Material challenged or likely to be challenged"?
|
| Foreign language titles |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#Foreign language titles
|
| Reliable sources and authors |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#Reliable sources and authors
|
| WP:BLP Controversial (positive or negative) |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#WP:BLP Controversial (positive or negative)
|
| Legalistic synonym bloat |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#Legalistic synonym bloat
|
| Using Stormfront as an example |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#Using Stormfront as an example
|
| direct quotation of sources |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#direct quotation of sources
|
| What is not original research |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#What is not original research
|
| What about material that is verifiable but not attributable? |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#What about material that is verifiable but not attributable?
|
| Fact-checking processes with inherent POV? |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#Fact-checking processes with inherent POV?
|
| Primary/secondary |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#Primary/secondary
|
| Popular Culture section removed |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#Popular Culture section removed
|
| Original research def |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#Original research def
|
| Professional expert |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 3#Professional expert
|
| A different sort of approach |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#A different sort of approach
|
| Back from the weekend |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Back from the weekend
|
| Missing things |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Missing things
|
| Is it ready? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Is it ready?
|
| Detailed examples and explanations can help |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Detailed examples and explanations can help
|
| Attribution vs verifiability |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Attribution vs verifiability
|
| Title: Attribution vs. Verifiability |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Title: Attribution vs. Verifiability
|
| Fact checking and media sources |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Fact checking and media sources
|
| Extremely biased |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Extremely biased
|
| Questionable sources |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Questionable sources
|
| Professional or academic |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Professional or academic
|
| Rewrite of lead section |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Rewrite of lead section
|
| All challenged material needs an inline citation? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#All challenged material needs an inline citation?
|
| Which is better? |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Which is better?
|
| First person facts, fictions, and fantasies |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#First person facts, fictions, and fantasies
|
| Non-hypothetical situation |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Non-hypothetical situation
|
| Pop culture removal (again) |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Pop culture removal (again)
|
| Critique of wording of lead section (continued) |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Critique of wording of lead section (continued)
|
| Questions |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/popculture#Questions
|
| Amateur versus professional |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/popculture#Amateur versus professional
|
| How many articles need a popular-culture exception, then? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/popculture#How many articles need a popular-culture exception, then?
|
| Operation Clambake |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Operation Clambake
|
| Ignore all rules |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Ignore all rules
|
| Preferred sources may depend |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/popculture#Preferred sources may depend
|
| Reliability |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/popculture#Reliability
|
| Binary versus continuous relationships |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/popculture#Binary versus continuous relationships
|
| A case which bears upon this |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#A case which bears upon this
|
| Proposed change that eliminates need for a pop culture exception. |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/popculture#Proposed change that eliminates need for a pop culture exception.
|
| Principles, not bright lines |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Principles, not bright lines
|
| Another example |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Another example
|
| Simple way to assess material for inclusion, removal or moving |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Simple way to assess material for inclusion, removal or moving
|
| Policy vs. Guideline |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/popculture#Policy vs. Guideline
|
| Primary sources |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Primary sources
|
| Citations for common knowledge or easily verifiable facts |
48 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Citations for common knowledge or easily verifiable facts
|
| What does this page add? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#What does this page add?
|
| Professional |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Professional
|
| Explicit and implicit attribution |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Explicit and implicit attribution
|
| Is there going to continue to be WP:RS |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 4#Is there going to continue to be WP:RS
|
| Another facet of popular culture |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 5#Another facet of popular culture
|
| Conflate "primary"/"secondary" with reliability? |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 5#Conflate "primary"/"secondary" with reliability?
|
| "Key principles" |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 5#"Key principles"
|
| Has this been baked for long enough? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 5#Has this been baked for long enough?
|
| We're in danger of derailing this |
43 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 5#We're in danger of derailing this
|
| Edit to what is not original research |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 5#Edit to what is not original research
|
| Unclear paragraph |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 5#Unclear paragraph
|
| "Core content policies" |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 5#"Core content policies"
|
| Agenda |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 5#Agenda
|
| Layout |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 5#Layout
|
| Questionable or self-published sources in articles about their authors. |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 6#Questionable or self-published sources in articles about their authors.
|
| Title |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 6#Title
|
| Changes |
36 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 6#Changes
|
| My absentee ballot: Non! |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 6#My absentee ballot: Non!
|
| The aim of this proposal - achieved or failing? retrievable? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 6#The aim of this proposal - achieved or failing? retrievable?
|
| Jules |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 6#Jules
|
| Another question, if I may |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 6#Another question, if I may
|
| The "use common sense" principle |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 6#The "use common sense" principle
|
| And again |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 6#And again
|
| Aside |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 6#Aside
|
| Towards concision |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Towards concision
|
| Third exception for self-published sources |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Third exception for self-published sources
|
| Purpose of the "Key Principles" section. |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Purpose of the "Key Principles" section.
|
| BLP section |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#BLP section
|
| Copy edit |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Copy edit
|
| Primary sources, again. |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 6#Primary sources, again.
|
| Time limit |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 6#Time limit
|
| Response to RFC |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Response to RFC
|
| Questionable sources exception |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Questionable sources exception
|
| Primary and secondary sources |
55 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Primary and secondary sources
|
| Impact of revisions at WP:EL |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Impact of revisions at WP:EL
|
| More about sources and original research |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#More about sources and original research
|
| Some random suggestions |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Some random suggestions
|
| Reformatting |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Reformatting
|
| Not OR if false |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Not OR if false
|
| Provision of WP:V that is not here |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Provision of WP:V that is not here
|
| Questionable sources redux |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Questionable sources redux
|
| Begging the question |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Begging the question
|
| Usenet posts? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Usenet posts?
|
| Phrasing of limitation of third exception |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Phrasing of limitation of third exception
|
| What is not original research - two comments |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#What is not original research - two comments
|
| What is and isn't OR: a dozen comments |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#What is and isn't OR: a dozen comments
|
| Policy tag |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Policy tag
|
| Third exception |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Third exception
|
| Publishing houses |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 7#Publishing houses
|
| Citing yourself |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 8#Citing yourself
|
| Relativating WP:NOR and WP:V |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 8#Relativating WP:NOR and WP:V
|
| Woo, I just quoted W:ATT for the first time! |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 8#Woo, I just quoted W:ATT for the first time!
|
| This policy is much clearer, excellent job! |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 8#This policy is much clearer, excellent job!
|
| Analysis of facts from statistical surveys |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 8#Analysis of facts from statistical surveys
|
| Some changes I made... |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 8#Some changes I made...
|
| In-line citation |
36 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 8#In-line citation
|
| The first exception (ho-hum) |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 8#The first exception (ho-hum)
|
| Is it soup yet? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 8#Is it soup yet?
|
| Problem with using the term "attribution" in the context of this policy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 9#Problem with using the term "attribution" in the context of this policy
|
| What is not original research |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 9#What is not original research
|
| without specialist knowledge (revisited) |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 9#without specialist knowledge (revisited)
|
| (Evil) straw poll |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 9#(Evil) straw poll
|
| Where professional sources offer shallow coverage |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 9#Where professional sources offer shallow coverage
|
| FAQ? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 9#FAQ?
|
| Synthesis example |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 9#Synthesis example
|
| Anon sources |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 9#Anon sources
|
| Inline citations |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 9#Inline citations
|
| Self-published sources again |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 9#Self-published sources again
|
| Differences from current policy |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 9#Differences from current policy
|
| What is not original research? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 9#What is not original research?
|
| Diligent dissident's scythe |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 9#Diligent dissident's scythe
|
| Intentions of restructure... |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 9#Intentions of restructure...
|
| Going large? |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Going large?
|
| Newspaper articles |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Newspaper articles
|
| Upgrading to policy |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Upgrading to policy
|
| diff |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#diff
|
| Exceptional claims |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Exceptional claims
|
| FAQ |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#FAQ
|
| Questionable sources |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Questionable sources
|
| Case in point: WP:ATT |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Case in point: WP:ATT
|
| It doesn't look to me as if there was a consensus. |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#It doesn't look to me as if there was a consensus.
|
| "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia ..." |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#"The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia ..."
|
| Blogs published by reliable-source outlets |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Blogs published by reliable-source outlets
|
| Primary / Secondary sources and 'original research' |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Primary / Secondary sources and 'original research'
|
| Some things missing as a result of the merger |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Some things missing as a result of the merger
|
| Changes |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Changes
|
| Foundation |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Foundation
|
| Request to clarify Purpose |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Request to clarify Purpose
|
| Non contentious material |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Non contentious material
|
| Naming |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Naming
|
| Kind of confusing |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Kind of confusing
|
| Burden of evidence |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Burden of evidence
|
| Unpublished synthesis of published material |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Unpublished synthesis of published material
|
| 3rd paragraph |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#3rd paragraph
|
| Policy Template |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Policy Template
|
| Big flaw |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Big flaw
|
| Capable of being supported |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Capable of being supported
|
| Dealing with precedent |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Dealing with precedent
|
| "as a rule" |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#"as a rule"
|
| Why does this include WP:RS? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Why does this include WP:RS?
|
| Foreign language sources and "assuming equal quality" |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Foreign language sources and "assuming equal quality"
|
| Clarify that O.R. is OK on Talk pages. |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Clarify that O.R. is OK on Talk pages.
|
| Reliable sources? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Reliable sources?
|
| Attribution may be confusing |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Attribution may be confusing
|
| Missing language from WP:V |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 10#Missing language from WP:V
|
| Suggestion on precedence |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Suggestion on precedence
|
| This policy sucks |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#This policy sucks
|
| The grand merge |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#The grand merge
|
| Concern |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Concern
|
| Suggestion to change criteria for inclusion of self-published sources on WP:RS |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Suggestion to change criteria for inclusion of self-published sources on WP:RS
|
| Redundancy |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Redundancy
|
| RS guideline |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#RS guideline
|
| Great work |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Great work
|
| Sorry... |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Sorry...
|
| Changes again |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Changes again
|
| Proposed change to self-published sources section |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Proposed change to self-published sources section
|
| This Policy Reinforces Stereotypes |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#This Policy Reinforces Stereotypes
|
| Repeats of source information when using summary style |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Repeats of source information when using summary style
|
| Can information be both verifiable and demonstrably false? |
54 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Can information be both verifiable and demonstrably false?
|
| Peer-review as a standard |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Peer-review as a standard
|
| Strong Objection |
51 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Strong Objection
|
| truth and verifiability |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#truth and verifiability
|
| If this is now Policy... |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#If this is now Policy...
|
| Book published by a company that has published only one book |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Book published by a company that has published only one book
|
| Status of WP:RS? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Status of WP:RS?
|
| "Improving"? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#"Improving"?
|
| V and NOR links |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#V and NOR links
|
| NOTE WP:V and WP:NOR ARE NO LONGER POLICY |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#NOTE WP:V and WP:NOR ARE NO LONGER POLICY
|
| Ideas "Already covered' |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Ideas "Already covered'
|
| Another suggestion |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Another suggestion
|
| Standards creep |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Standards creep
|
| Tertiary sources? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Tertiary sources?
|
| Jesus and the eye |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Jesus and the eye
|
| Taking WP:RS in a new direction? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Taking WP:RS in a new direction?
|
| Reliable sources section |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Reliable sources section
|
| Primary source |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Primary source
|
| A question on Primary, Secondary (and Tertiary) Sources? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#A question on Primary, Secondary (and Tertiary) Sources?
|
| A question on what we mean by Source? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#A question on what we mean by Source?
|
| Suggestion for OR example to replace A + B = C example |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Suggestion for OR example to replace A + B = C example
|
| Minimal requirements for reliable sources |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Minimal requirements for reliable sources
|
| Is Boing Boing.net RS as a secondary source? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Is Boing Boing.net RS as a secondary source?
|
| Wording tweak |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Wording tweak
|
| "Promotional in Nature" |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#"Promotional in Nature"
|
| What is not OR? |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#What is not OR?
|
| Personal web site that has its own references section |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Personal web site that has its own references section
|
| Isn't there a policy saying Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source? |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Isn't there a policy saying Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source?
|
| See also sections |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#See also sections
|
| Can one of you ATT RS V NOR NPOV gurus lend a hand? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Can one of you ATT RS V NOR NPOV gurus lend a hand?
|
| WP:RS and WP:CITE |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#WP:RS and WP:CITE
|
| Is this site reliable? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Is this site reliable?
|
| Assessing sources |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Assessing sources
|
| Is this reliable for determining if a film is a may december romance |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Is this reliable for determining if a film is a may december romance
|
| Clarification: "the relevant academic community" |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Clarification: "the relevant academic community"
|
| "the article is primarily based on sources independent of the subject of the article." |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#"the article is primarily based on sources independent of the subject of the article."
|
| Archived again |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Archived again
|
| Tagging and removal of unsourced info |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Tagging and removal of unsourced info
|
| Why are non-published materials forbidden? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Why are non-published materials forbidden?
|
| Examples from arbcoms |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Examples from arbcoms
|
| RfC in a Dispute concerning Original Research |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#RfC in a Dispute concerning Original Research
|
| Notability |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Notability
|
| Bible says Jesus advocates eye removal? what. |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Bible says Jesus advocates eye removal? what.
|
| Superseded?? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Superseded??
|
| Newspapers are primary |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#Newspapers are primary
|
| Important item missing from RS |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Important item missing from RS
|
| WP:RS |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 11#WP:RS
|
| Specific use question, advice please |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Specific use question, advice please
|
| What about well-sourced absurd claims? |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#What about well-sourced absurd claims?
|
| Role of truth |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Role of truth
|
| Primary sources examples |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Primary sources examples
|
| independent sources |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#independent sources
|
| Can a PhD thesis be a reliable source? |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Can a PhD thesis be a reliable source?
|
| Press releases as a primary source |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Press releases as a primary source
|
| Self-published source restrictions seem too broad |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Self-published source restrictions seem too broad
|
| Proposed new example of synthesis |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Proposed new example of synthesis
|
| lecture not a reliable source |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#lecture not a reliable source
|
| Skeptic Magazine not a reliable source? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Skeptic Magazine not a reliable source?
|
| My compliments |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#My compliments
|
| Personal Experience and Knowledge as a Primary Source |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Personal Experience and Knowledge as a Primary Source
|
| image manipulation |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#image manipulation
|
| text needs clarification |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#text needs clarification
|
| Dispute tag |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Dispute tag
|
| The Register |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#The Register
|
| Copying of information from Village Pump |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Copying of information from Village Pump
|
| Clarification of "in relation to the topic of that article" |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Clarification of "in relation to the topic of that article"
|
| Is an expert posting to a moderated mailing list reliable? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Is an expert posting to a moderated mailing list reliable?
|
| When did this happen? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#When did this happen?
|
| Web-based fora |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Web-based fora
|
| Poll re "verifiability, not truth" versus "attributable ... not whether it is true". |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Poll re "verifiability, not truth" versus "attributable ... not whether it is true".
|
| Poll re handling of apparently false, but attributable, statements |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 12#Poll re handling of apparently false, but attributable, statements
|
| Loss of convenience links |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Loss of convenience links
|
| Inflation adjusted numbers--Original Research or Reasonable Calculation? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Inflation adjusted numbers--Original Research or Reasonable Calculation?
|
| Is this really policy? |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Is this really policy?
|
| Comment on secondary sources |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Comment on secondary sources
|
| Use of printed material rather than online sources |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Use of printed material rather than online sources
|
| Why are all the old redirects hijacked? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Why are all the old redirects hijacked?
|
| Research by a wikipedian |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Research by a wikipedian
|
| Photographic evidence, paywalled sites allowed? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Photographic evidence, paywalled sites allowed?
|
| Peer review |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Peer review
|
| This is silly. |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#This is silly.
|
| Independent Sources, means not duplications? Or does it mean more than that? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Independent Sources, means not duplications? Or does it mean more than that?
|
| Independent of the Subject |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Independent of the Subject
|
| "in articles about themselves" |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#"in articles about themselves"
|
| Primary source |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Primary source
|
| Burden of evidence |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Burden of evidence
|
| question about application of Wikipedia:Attribution |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#question about application of Wikipedia:Attribution
|
| Effects on External links |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Effects on External links
|
| Weak sources or sources used outside context |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Weak sources or sources used outside context
|
| Non-scholarly sources |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Non-scholarly sources
|
| Individual sections need tagging |
75 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Individual sections need tagging
|
| Synthesis section |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Synthesis section
|
| WP:NPOV |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#WP:NPOV
|
| Role of truth |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Role of truth
|
| Advice requested |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Advice requested
|
| Comments needed |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Comments needed
|
| Confirming editors' credentials |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Confirming editors' credentials
|
| Youtube |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Youtube
|
| Contradiction |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Contradiction
|
| WP:NOR |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#WP:NOR 2
|
| Is this Original Research? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Is this Original Research?
|
| Student newspapers |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Student newspapers
|
| Congratulations! |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Congratulations!
|
| Stealing attributions from somewhere else. |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Stealing attributions from somewhere else.
|
| Protect from moves |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Protect from moves
|
| references to subscription-only websites |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#references to subscription-only websites
|
| Excess verbosity |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Excess verbosity
|
| Tags |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Tags
|
| Question on an RS |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 13#Question on an RS
|
| OR wording seems to go too far and to be self-contradictory |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#OR wording seems to go too far and to be self-contradictory
|
| Consensus |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Consensus
|
| Synthesis needs its own bulletpoint |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Synthesis needs its own bulletpoint
|
| Contentious topics |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Contentious topics
|
| Remove silly instruction creep |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Remove silly instruction creep
|
| Original Research definition -- unified discussion (hopefully) |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Original Research definition -- unified discussion (hopefully)
|
| Okay, I think I've figured out this mental block over "synthesis" |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Okay, I think I've figured out this mental block over "synthesis"
|
| Where to discuss massive dubious sources? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Where to discuss massive dubious sources?
|
| Random idea - Attribution (Fiction) |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Random idea - Attribution (Fiction)
|
| An NP-complete problem (not evident information, but easily verifiable) |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#An NP-complete problem (not evident information, but easily verifiable)
|
| This merger is a really bad idea |
47 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#This merger is a really bad idea
|
| "Original research" |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#"Original research"
|
| It was done upside down |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#It was done upside down
|
| Status November 2007 |
43 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Status November 2007
|
| Were there merge notices? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Were there merge notices?
|
| Line-by-line criticism |
87 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Line-by-line criticism
|
| Is it still an official policy or not? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Is it still an official policy or not?
|
| Commented out a paragraph |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Commented out a paragraph
|
| Freezing WP:V and WP:NOR |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Freezing WP:V and WP:NOR
|
| Question about when to attribute, and proposed change... |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Question about when to attribute, and proposed change...
|
| Attribution sounds way different from Verifiability |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Attribution sounds way different from Verifiability
|
| 3 - 2 = 4 |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#3 - 2 = 4
|
| OK, things are now in a total mess... |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#OK, things are now in a total mess...
|
| BLP |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#BLP
|
| Whatever the heck this mess turns out to be, please keep this stuff... |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Whatever the heck this mess turns out to be, please keep this stuff...
|
| Merge from Wikipedia:Reliable sources |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Merge from Wikipedia:Reliable sources
|
| Don't change the policy, please |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Don't change the policy, please
|
| "Further reading" sections |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#"Further reading" sections
|
| Can we freeze everything while we work on this? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Can we freeze everything while we work on this?
|
| Strong objection |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Strong objection
|
| Request unprotection of page |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Request unprotection of page
|
| WP:ATT: Join the discussion at |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#WP:ATT: Join the discussion at
|
| Is this a reliable source? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Is this a reliable source?
|
| Role of truth |
96 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#Role of truth
|
| An inquiry on the synthesis policy (copied from here) |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#An inquiry on the synthesis policy (copied from here)
|
| Very logical merger: proof |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Very logical merger: proof
|
| Page protection notice |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Page protection notice
|
| Something must be true to be verifiable. Verifiability standards are a measuring rod for truth/accuracy. |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#Something must be true to be verifiable. Verifiability standards are a measuring rod for truth/accuracy.
|
| Merge and policy tags |
43 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Merge and policy tags
|
| Microformat for citations |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Microformat for citations
|
| A look at WP:RS and how it fits with this |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#A look at WP:RS and how it fits with this
|
| Explanation of why the merge was initiated |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Explanation of why the merge was initiated
|
| edit protected |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#edit protected
|
| Suggested tag |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Suggested tag
|
| Dispute notice on talk page |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Dispute notice on talk page
|
| Concerning "Unpublished synthesis of published material" |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Concerning "Unpublished synthesis of published material"
|
| Canonical vs. definitive (or another word) |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Canonical vs. definitive (or another word)
|
| One little point |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#One little point
|
| Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources#Change "Reliable Sources" to "Acceptable Sources" |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources#Change "Reliable Sources" to "Acceptable Sources"
|
| Lets abolish 99% of the rules |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Lets abolish 99% of the rules
|
| Jimmy Wales in "See Also" and "Sources and Notes" |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Jimmy Wales in "See Also" and "Sources and Notes"
|
| Page protection? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Page protection?
|
| Reliable source or reliable facts? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Reliable source or reliable facts?
|
| Truth is crucial in articles about living people |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#Truth is crucial in articles about living people
|
| Page for creating collaborative expression of arguments against |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Page for creating collaborative expression of arguments against
|
| How do you distinguish "false" from "true"? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#How do you distinguish "false" from "true"?
|
| More discussion about truth |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#More discussion about truth
|
| Shortcut |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Shortcut
|
| Interwiki link |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Interwiki link
|
| original research by negative deduction |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#original research by negative deduction
|
| Jimbo Wales's requested poll nearly done - please see |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Jimbo Wales's requested poll nearly done - please see
|
| unpublished synthesis or something quite different |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#unpublished synthesis or something quite different
|
| The order of the two sections |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#The order of the two sections
|
| Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Attribution/Poll |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Attribution/Poll
|
| Do not change the core policy |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#Do not change the core policy
|
| Historical question |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#Historical question
|
| Irrelevant discussion |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#Irrelevant discussion
|
| Paragraph shortcuts |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Paragraph shortcuts
|
| Disturbed by lack of dispute/protect tags and by disrespect |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Disturbed by lack of dispute/protect tags and by disrespect
|
| Other language sources and Verifiability guidelines |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Other language sources and Verifiability guidelines
|
| Back To Basics: A Fundamental Question |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#Back To Basics: A Fundamental Question
|
| Attribution introduction |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Attribution introduction
|
| WP:RS? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll#WP:RS?
|
| Proving something that is "common sense" without any academic sources |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Proving something that is "common sense" without any academic sources
|
| Just an observation. |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll#Just an observation.
|
| Extend? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll#Extend?
|
| What does "No consensus" mean? |
51 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll#What does "No consensus" mean?
|
| AP:ATT and WP:NOR |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#AP:ATT and WP:NOR
|
| Misleading statements |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Misleading statements
|
| WP is incapable of determining truth |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#WP is incapable of determining truth
|
| Poll closed |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll#Poll closed
|
| Attributing videos |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Attributing videos
|
| Please comment on possible wordings of policy |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#Please comment on possible wordings of policy
|
| Please add this to the notes section |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll#Please add this to the notes section
|
| Idiot's guide |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Idiot's guide
|
| A positive outcome |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll#A positive outcome
|
| OK |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll#OK
|
| Role of truth |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Role of truth
|
| Orignial research |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#Orignial research
|
| I object to the classification of my vote and the votes of the 101 other editors who voted in the "Neutral/qualified/compromise/other" section as "neutral". |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll#I object to the classification of my vote and the votes of the 101 other editors who voted in the "Neutral/qualified/compromise/other" section as "neutral".
|
| Attempt to summarize |
41 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll#Attempt to summarize
|
| Wide support |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Wide support
|
| Aftermath |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Aftermath
|
| This won't do |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll#This won't do
|
| Verifiability vs Attribution |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Verifiability vs Attribution
|
| Reluctant acceptance of the primate of "Attribution" |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Reluctant acceptance of the primate of "Attribution"
|
| Changing back... |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Changing back...
|
| Original Research changes |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Original Research changes
|
| reliable source: a professional's book review/letter to the editor |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#reliable source: a professional's book review/letter to the editor
|
| Nostalgia |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Nostalgia
|
| Section order |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Section order
|
| So what was the result of this poll? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll#So what was the result of this poll?
|
| Dead? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Dead?
|
| Typo fix |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll#Typo fix
|
| Working party |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Working party
|
| Working party |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll#Working party
|
| Working party |
36 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Working party
|
| Proposals |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Proposals
|
| Fabulous Eight? |
45 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Fabulous Eight?
|
| Utterly ridiculous |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Utterly ridiculous
|
| Numbers |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Numbers
|
| Purpose of working group |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Purpose of working group
|
| Terms and conditions |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Terms and conditions
|
| Shall I start? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Shall I start?
|
| transclusion mockup in progress |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#transclusion mockup in progress
|
| What's wrong with having a back-up plan? |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#What's wrong with having a back-up plan?
|
| Scientific controversies |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#Scientific controversies
|
| Suggestions about the way forward |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Suggestions about the way forward
|
| Thoughts to mulch on |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Thoughts to mulch on
|
| Violating clause in this rule to WP:NPOV |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 14#Violating clause in this rule to WP:NPOV
|
| The new lead... |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#The new lead...
|
| Transclusion compromise |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Transclusion compromise
|
| Editprotected Wikipedia:Attribution/Poll/header |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll#Editprotected Wikipedia:Attribution/Poll/header
|
| What would this do? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#What would this do?
|
| Rewrite the page? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Rewrite the page?
|
| extremism is not per se a valid reason to restrict the use of a source |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 15#extremism is not per se a valid reason to restrict the use of a source
|
| Proposal on citing "consensus" |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 15#Proposal on citing "consensus"
|
| RFC at WP:FRINGE |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 15#RFC at WP:FRINGE
|
| Relationship between NOR and V |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Relationship between NOR and V
|
| Article with a LOT of Synthesis |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 15#Article with a LOT of Synthesis
|
| Working group #1 - Are we still doing this? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Working group #1 - Are we still doing this?
|
| Privacy of working group and review |
56 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Privacy of working group and review
|
| WG#2 last call |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#WG#2 last call
|
| Anti-ATT Bias??? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Anti-ATT Bias???
|
| These policies aint worth a crap without critique |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#These policies aint worth a crap without critique
|
| Ascertaining a publication's "editorial oversight" and "fact-checking policy" |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 15#Ascertaining a publication's "editorial oversight" and "fact-checking policy"
|
| Any reader should be able to verify that material added to Wikipedia |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 15#Any reader should be able to verify that material added to Wikipedia
|
| Primary, secondary and tertiary sources |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 15#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources
|
| Original Research changes (take 2) |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 16#Original Research changes (take 2)
|
| Working Party - Let's Get It Started |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Working Party - Let's Get It Started
|
| The threshhold issue again: replacing WP:NOTTRUTH with matterial stolen from WP:NPOV |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 16#The threshhold issue again: replacing WP:NOTTRUTH with matterial stolen from WP:NPOV
|
| Attribution and dispute resolution |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Attribution and dispute resolution
|
| OR on Talk pages |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 16#OR on Talk pages
|
| What does this WP:ATT cover? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 16#What does this WP:ATT cover?
|
| No WP policy will do any good... |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#No WP policy will do any good...
|
| Search engines are not original research |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 16#Search engines are not original research
|
| "reliable publication process" |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#"reliable publication process"
|
| Publishing houses |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#Publishing houses
|
| Online |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#Online
|
| POVness of the View of majority of scholars |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#POVness of the View of majority of scholars
|
| A completely different topic regarding WP:ATT |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#A completely different topic regarding WP:ATT
|
| What does not need to be cited |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#What does not need to be cited
|
| Notable views |
36 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#Notable views
|
| Vote |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#Vote
|
| Legislate, procrastinate or delineate? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#Legislate, procrastinate or delineate?
|
| Explicit mention of examples (source code, math, etc.) |
55 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#Explicit mention of examples (source code, math, etc.)
|
| FAQ page |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#FAQ page
|
| Too many footnotes |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#Too many footnotes
|
| Can newspaper articles be used to support a political analysis? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#Can newspaper articles be used to support a political analysis?
|
| Cost of completeness? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#Cost of completeness?
|
| The second sentence |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#The second sentence
|
| Note: editors are using this page to threaten stubs with deletion |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#Note: editors are using this page to threaten stubs with deletion
|
| Intent to clarify "direct" verses "indirect" |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#Intent to clarify "direct" verses "indirect"
|
| Great Job! |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#Great Job!
|
| publishing? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#publishing?
|
| "challenged or likely to be challenged" |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#"challenged or likely to be challenged"
|
| Truth requires non-contradiction |
46 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#Truth requires non-contradiction
|
| Specific reliability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#Specific reliability
|
| Wholesale deletion |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#Wholesale deletion
|
| Smith/Jones example |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#Smith/Jones example
|
| The second sentence |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#The second sentence
|
| Is it over? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion#Is it over?
|
| Idea for a tag re: reliability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#Idea for a tag re: reliability
|
| Status? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#Status?
|
| Status? |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Status?
|
| Coastlines |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#Coastlines
|
| What is being proposed? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#What is being proposed?
|
| References in wikipedia lists |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 17#References in wikipedia lists
|
| Factual accuracy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Role of truth#Factual accuracy
|
| Revive discussion? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Revive discussion?
|
| Links to sections, not summaries |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Links to sections, not summaries
|
| Image Attribution |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Image Attribution
|
| Status - Historical? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Status - Historical?
|
| Types of sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Types of sources
|
| Protected |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Protected
|
| Interwiki link for Farsi page |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Interwiki link for Farsi page
|
| RFC: Status as of April 2008 |
45 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#RFC: Status as of April 2008
|
| Attribution in Image captions |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Attribution in Image captions
|
| Something missing here |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Something missing here
|
| Welcome back SlimVirgin! |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Welcome back SlimVirgin!
|
| Essay |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Essay
|
| Wikipedia:Attribution#Living persons |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Wikipedia:Attribution#Living persons
|
| Wikipedia:Attribution#How to cite sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Wikipedia:Attribution#How to cite sources
|
| Question |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Question
|
| Plea for discussion |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Plea for discussion
|
| Protected page |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Protected page
|
| Intent to edit |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Intent to edit
|
| The (first) threshold for inclusion |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#The (first) threshold for inclusion
|
| Protected (2) |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Protected (2)
|
| Status June 2008 |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Status June 2008
|
| RfC - Status? |
95 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#RfC - Status?
|
| Header transclusion |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Header transclusion
|
| Bold action |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Bold action
|
| All material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source; in practice not all material is attributed |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#All material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source; in practice not all material is attributed
|
| Closure |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Closure
|
| Looking at the RFC results so far... and a proposal |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Looking at the RFC results so far... and a proposal
|
| Time for a history lesson |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Time for a history lesson
|
| "canonical summary" |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#"canonical summary"
|
| What about "Essay"? |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#What about "Essay"?
|
| Protected (3) |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 18#Protected (3)
|
| Status March 2010 |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution#Status March 2010
|
| Use of term |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution#Use of term
|
| Can we discuss the quality of a source? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution#Can we discuss the quality of a source?
|
| Attributing in-text (WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV) compared to this page; retitle? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution#Attributing in-text (WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV) compared to this page; retitle?
|
| Is Rejecta Mathematica a reliable source? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution#Is Rejecta Mathematica a reliable source?
|
| For the record |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution#For the record
|
| Not an accurate summary |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution#Not an accurate summary
|
| Vacate this page |
38 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution#Vacate this page
|
| A versus B |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution#A versus B
|
| Talk page transclusion: is it a COPYVIO or ATTRIB problem? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution#Talk page transclusion: is it a COPYVIO or ATTRIB problem?
|
| I can find this... |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution#I can find this...
|
| Where was the rationale for this change specifically discussed? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution#Where was the rationale for this change specifically discussed?
|
| "Wikipedia:A" listed at Redirects for discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Attribution#"Wikipedia:A" listed at Redirects for discussion
|
