Wikipedia talk:Avoid weasel words/Consensus straw poll
Do you agree with the guideline on weasel words? If you do not, state whether you disagree with the definition of specific words or phrases or with the guideline in general.
- Neutral Not sure what this is in response to, but voting, and straw polls, can not proceed on the basis of vague definitions. As in, -agree with the guideline on weasel words- agree with what/ that there should be a guideline, that there is a guideline, that it should be a policy, that it should not be a guideline, that it disagrees with other policies, that it restates other policies redundantly, or that any specific word or phrase is ambiguous/clear as WP:CRYSTAL? Edits are welcome on a guideline page such as AWW, and any draft rewrites are discussed, word by word, on talk/pages. Straw polls generally follow then, if necessary, or am I missing some discussion that's taking place in another forum?Newbyguesses - Talk 02:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Support It mirrors a courtroom objection to gossip. Anonymous evidence can hav weight, but it should be measured in documents of this class. BrewJay (talk) 04:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Support I think this policy generally a good idea. I also think as part of the guideline it should be "cite it or omit it." --Ipatrol (talk) 00:34, 17 October 2008 (UTC)