Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Content in Wikipedia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What is the point of this Article on Content?

[edit]

Nothing important links to this page. This is a failed proposed definition. I propose that the shortcut WP:CONTENT be redirected to Wikipedia:Content disclaimer and discus deletion of the Project page. - Stillwaterising (talk) 05:57, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Content is more than articles

[edit]

A possibly simpler definition of content would be all the material that is suitable for print in a printed encyclopedia. This would include

  • articles
  • article categorization (non-administrative categories)
    • These could be used to form an automated index
  • Some help pages (and possibly a very few project pages including some disclaimers)
    • The preface of most encyclopedias does include a how to use it and interpret its conventions
  • Portals
    • The end of many encyclopedias does include such material
  • Print-worthy redirects to any of the above
    • Also likely part of an automated index

Having said all that, I don't think there will ever be an actually printed encyclopedia, although there have been versioned CDs, and student editions, eg. WP:1 and simple:. Dpleibovitz (talk) 17:22, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 September 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to "Content in Wikipedia". (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:16, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Wikipedia:ContentWikipedia:What is "content" on Wikipedia? – or Wikipedia:The content of Wikipedia or Wikipedia:Content in Wikipedia. This rather-minimalistic information page is just a five-sentence definition of what "content" is on Wikipedia (plus some hatnotes and "see also" links – it's almost a disambiguation page). A more suitable use of the name "WP:CONTENT" would be to redirect it to the same place as the harder-to-remember WP:FOC shortcut – i.e., to redirect it to the guideline about focusing on article content rather than editor behavior. As recorded above, someone else suggested in 2010 to redirect the shortcut to Wikipedia:Content disclaimer. I suppose my comments are really more about WP:CONTENT than WP:Content, but it might be confusing if WP:Content exists and WP:CONTENT leads to somewhere else. There has also been some questioning on the Talk page about the suitability of the definition as well. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:38, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Excel in Cells

[edit]

Excel Tutorials — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffin Joseph Chakkalamattam (talkcontribs) 10:50, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]