Wikipedia talk:Database reports/Articles containing invalid template parameters
 | To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, please start new conversations at Wikipedia talk:Database reports. |
{{Requested move/dated|Wikipedia:Database reports/Articles containing invalid template parameters}}
Wikipedia:Database reports/Articles containing bullshit template parameters → Articles containing invalid template parameters – maybe I'm being prudish but I see no reason for unnecessary profanity. — Tivedshambo (t/c) 17:01, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, you're being prudish.
- I'm not sure "invalid" has the same connotations as "bullshit." The parameters aren't really actively harmful and some of them were once perfectly valid, but unless I can come up with a better title, I suppose I can move this report later. --MZMcBride (talk) 18:49, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think you're being prudish. It's random and unnecessary. Rennell435 (talk) 08:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Moved, by popular demand. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:57, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Maybe I have a high tolerance for profanity, but I liked the former name. There are too few things that make a Wikipedian laugh, these days. AGK [•] 23:31, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Like (Maybe every database report needs a profanity-laced redirect....) --MZMcBride (talk) 04:29, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- Maybe I have a high tolerance for profanity, but I liked the former name. There are too few things that make a Wikipedian laugh, these days. AGK [•] 23:31, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Moved, by popular demand. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:57, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
