"... in 1999 it was listed in Modern Library's 100 Best Nonfiction Books." For some reason this wording bothers me. It implies that it was a list, but it could have been an individual publication or whatnot. I feel as if you are missing a descriptive noun.
"After she would finish a chapter, she would bring it to Moore to critique." -- Perhaps "After finishing a chapter, she would bring it to Moore to critique." or "Each chapter she wrote was brought to Moore for critique upon completion."
Sure; changed to your first suggestion. María(yllosubmarine) 13:24, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Moore in particular recommended that she expand the book's first chapter..." -- As opposed to?
Not sure what you mean? I don't see it as oppositional -- more like "particularly", "especially", "specifically". Would one of these words work better? María(yllosubmarine) 13:24, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I kept it in the image caption, just in case people don't want to scroll up. María(yllosubmarine) 13:24, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If I remember the guidelines correctly, the date (1854) should be with the first mention of Walden above (at the very least in the background section.)
A very interesting read and I look forward to supporting once I no longer have any issues (mostly nitpicks, looking back). Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:00, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much for the review, Crisco! I really appreciate it. Just one question above, if you don't mind. María(yllosubmarine) 13:24, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]