"VHEMT supports human extinction because it would prevent environmental degradation and man-made human suffering" -- I'm assuming that if all humans were extinct, then there would be no human suffering at all (unless this group also believes in an afterlife)
"VHEMT promotes a more extreme ideology than Population Action International, a group that argues humanity should reduce—but not eliminate—its population to care for the Earth. However, the VHEMT platform is more moderate and serious than the Church of Euthanasia, which advocates population reduction by suicide and cannibalism." -- Wouldn't this be better in the ideology section?
I read that bit in the same sense as the phrase "to threaten violence", but I could see where confusion could arise. GRAPPLEX16:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I knew what was meant... it's just there was possible confusion there.
"Other benefits of ceasing human reproduction that he cites include the abolition of abortion, war, and starvation." -- To me, we abolish an institution. Starvation doesn't quite fit here IMHO.
