Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/York Park/archive4

2c review[edit]

Fifelfoo (talk) 07:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Has a publication date, "Wednesday, 18 October 2006" :"Relive Tassie football's glory days"

Deceptive: ""A History of Tasmanian Football".". Authored by The Department of Economic Development, Tourism and the Arts. Hosted at http://www.tassiefootyteam.com.au/. Not exactly published by "Government of Tasmania"

Ah ... nice spot .. what do you suggest however? Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

|author=The Department of Economic Development, Tourism and the Arts (Tas.) |publisher=tassiefootyteam.com.au ? Fifelfoo (talk) 10:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is a submission to a Senate inquiry, make explicit, ""Launceston City Council / York Park & Inveresk Precinct Authority Submission". " re: Parliament of Australia Senate Inquiry, Inquiry into matters relating to the establishment of an Australian Football League Team for Tasmania, Senate Standing Committee on Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport

Has an author, "Rod Morris", " "A Short History". Launceston City Cycling Club."

Grandstand fire deliberately lit has a byline, "AAP"

Citation of ABC inconsistent. Are we contracting or spelling out?

Spelling out. Done. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hawks confirm Tasmanian deal has a wireline AAP

Melbourne wins friendly has a wireline AAP

Aurora changing shape has a byline Adam Smith

Lewis to beef up... has a byline ROGER VAUGHAN

check your Examiners, I don't have a sub

Neither. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Damn. Just a tick. Nope. SLNSW, USYD, UNSW don't hold. Fifelfoo (talk) 10:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to indicate which subsection of ABC authored a component

Why not Tasmania has a byline David Davutovic

Full citation please: The Examiner, p. 1, 1959-03-18

Full citation please: The Examiner, p. 1, 2007-12-09

Info already existed when editing this article. Suggest we scrap info? Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it doesn't need a citation, and the citation is poor... there's a solution implicit. Fifelfoo (talk) 10:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, sorry for the jargon. A byline is a by-line, the line which says who its by. If the article is authored, its a very strong expectation that the author will be recognised. Similarly, if the article came from a wire, a news service, like AAP, its customary to indicate this. Personally, I'd chuck AAP in as the author, unless a separate author is listed. If you can't get at The Examiner, then you've done the best you can do. Fifelfoo (talk) 10:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, doing the ones I can do. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 21:56, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done wire and by-lines. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 06:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]