Wikipedia talk:Good article review circles
 | Welcome to GARC/Circles Below are the circles of review. Please accept/decline your invitation below and/or discuss any relevant information about your circle. |
| Main | Criteria | Instructions | Nominations | Backlog drives | Mentorship | Discussion | Reassessment | Report |
|
|
Circle #1[edit]
If you wish to proceed and review the article you have been assigned, please indicate below by writing y in the accept column next to your username. If for whatever reason you feel you cannot proceed, please indicate below by writing n in the accept column next to your username and notify the coordinator, GMH Melbourne (talk). Kindly report back to this page once you have completed the review.
Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review.
| The Sharpest Lives is assigned to review: In the Darkest of Nights, Let the Birds Sing (review) |
SupremeLordBagel is assigned to review: Ghost in the Machine (song) (review) |
| PSA is assigned to review: Windswept Adan (review) |
Joeyquism is assigned to review: Growing Up (The Linda Lindas album) (review) |
This is the very first good article review circle to take place, please reply to this message should you have questions or comments. Please also provide any feedback you have on this new process. — GMH Melbourne (talk) 08:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- @PSA and Dylan620: I am not sure how this process will work with the two of you nominiating, perhaps one of you can review the article and another can respond to the comments left for Ghost in the Machine. - GMH Melbourne (talk) 08:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- @GMH Melbourne: That sounds like a fair way to divvy it up, if PSA is game. Personally, I have equal preference between reviewing Windswept Adan and responding to comments on "Ghost in the Machine". An alternate suggestion is that PSA and I could collaborate on the review itself. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 18:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- @GMH Melbourne, thank you for setting this process up. I look forward to seeing how this goes and hope this will stimulate more GAN reviewers and more quality reviews. I will be on an island trip for four days with spotty wifi, so @Dylan620 the most I can do is address comments for GitM; I trust you with the review process. Let me know if guidance is needed with any reviews. PSA 🏕️🪐 (please make some noise...) 00:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- @GMH Melbourne: That sounds like a fair way to divvy it up, if PSA is game. Personally, I have equal preference between reviewing Windswept Adan and responding to comments on "Ghost in the Machine". An alternate suggestion is that PSA and I could collaborate on the review itself. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 18:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! Another user seems to be reviewing GitM right now... Is there any way I can still participate in the review (e.g. some fly-by comments), or am I not able to do anything? SupremeLordBagel (talk to me) 20:54, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Good question, perhaps some fly-by comments on Ghost in the Machine and other articles in the circle could be helpful. GMH Melbourne (talk) 01:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Circle #3[edit]
If you wish to proceed and review the article you have been assigned, please indicate below by writing y in the accept column next to your username. If for whatever reason you feel you cannot proceed, please indicate below by writing n in the accept column next to your username and notify the coordinator, GMH Melbourne (talk). Kindly report back to this page once you have completed the review.
Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review.
| Chiswick Chap is assigned to review: Margaret Carroux (review) |
Kusma is assigned to review: Michael Dillon (review) |
| Unexpectedlydian is assigned to review: Isaac Franklin (review) |
Generalissima is assigned to review: Pseudotranslation in The Lord of the Rings (review) |
Happy editing! — GMH Melbourne (talk) 15:21, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- @GMH Melbourne, I think we can get started: @Chiswick Chap accepted here. —Kusma (talk) 20:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Circle #4[edit]
If you wish to proceed and review the article you have been assigned, please indicate below by writing y in the accept column next to your username. If for whatever reason you feel you cannot proceed, please indicate below by writing n in the accept column next to your username and notify the coordinator, GMH Melbourne (talk). Kindly report back to this page once you have completed the review.
Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review.
| Fritzmann2002 is assigned to review: R. Ames Montgomery (review) |
PCN02WPS is assigned to review: American Samoa at the 2020 Summer Olympics (review) |
| Arconning is assigned to review: Matthew Charles Johnson (review) |
GMH Melbourne is assigned to review: Hypericum huber-morathii (review) |
Happy editing! — GMH Melbourne (talk) 02:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- It shall commence^^ Arconning (talk) 16:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Arconning, Fritzmann2002, and PCN02WPS: Good to go! GMH Melbourne (talk) 00:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC)