Wikipedia talk:Press coverage 2010

Wikipedia Project‑class

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
Project	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Wikipedia mentioned in passing: http://cuteoverload.com/2010/04/28/sidetracked-by-wikipedias-tangled-web-of-information-bunny-wastes-day-learns-little/. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MPs expenses[edit]

MPs accused of Wikipedia expenses 'cover-up'. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 13:28, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Norman Chad[edit]

The syndicated column "The Book of Norman" by sportswriter Norman Chad had this quote recently:

"I grew up with the Encyclopedia Britannica, usually written by experts and scholars. Now I sometimes use Wikipedia, sometimes written by 14-year-olds between 'Hannah Montana' reruns."

-"Clicked on, ticked off via the Internet"

Not sure how widely the column is syndicated, though, so may not be notable enough. Mapsax (talk) 21:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Guardian, 18-08-10[edit]

The Guardian is running a story on how Zionist groups have organised Wikipedia editing training in order to ensure that their (...no doubt 'neutral'!) point of view is represented on Wikipedia. Should this be added to the Wikipedia press coverage section? 80.176.88.21 (talk) 20:43, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added it, although my formatting wasnt great. Cheers Earlypsychosis (talk) 09:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]