Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Kender/Archive002

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Conditions

[edit]

To avoid potential conflict and drama, I am proposing voluntary conditions for the duration of formal mediation:

  1. Do not place new templates on related articles unless all parties agree they are appropriate.
  2. Do not remove existing templates unless all parties agree they are resolved.
  3. Do not nominate related articles for deletion, move, merge or redirect, unless clearly uncontroversial.
  4. Do not undertake or propose significant changes to related articles without discussion and consensus prior to the changes.

Thoughts? Comments? Vassyana (talk) 12:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer to have everyone note their agreement before moving forward. It's best not to assume it will be agreeable before they've commented. Vassyana (talk) 13:15, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Should I sign on to this mediation attempt as an involved party? I'm another among many who's argued with Gavin over his use of tags in articles (several of which are mentioned in the RfM), though I haven't touched the Kender article. McJeff (talk) 17:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Vassyana, unlike CSHunt, McJeff was one of the first people (if not the first) with whom I discussed the possibility of mediation. If there are not already too many involved parties, you may add him if you feel it appropriate. BOZ (talk) 04:53, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I originally thought I'd stay out of it considering that other users have been more involved in the actual content dispute than I have. But Gavin continues to post his "cease and desist" templates on my talk page [1], which prompted me to offer to get involved. McJeff (talk) 16:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It would be best not to remove any of Gavin's templates during the mediation case, just to let the issue rest in the meantime. BOZ (talk) 17:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]