Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/March 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Today's featured article for March 1, 2025
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 1, 2025
Picture of the day for March 1, 2025

The featured picture for this day has not yet been chosen.

In general, pictures of the day are scheduled in order of promotion to featured status. See Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Guidelines for full guidelines.

2012 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 05:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2013 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 08:23, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 10:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's out of rotation this year. If you look in the staging area, March 1 has a long list of eligible articles, so most of them are going to be excluded every year. I didn't know about the holiday, though, so the article about the battle gets to sneak in through the back door. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 17:06, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2015 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 09:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2016 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 08:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed swap

[edit]

I propose removing the 2014 fact about the murder and replacing it with "1815 - Georgetown University was chartered by Congress as the first Catholic institution of higher education in the United States." Ergo Sum 18:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ergo Sum: Georgetown University is already featured on Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/January 23, so I would be reluctant to put a sub-article on a separate day. howcheng {chat} 08:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 08:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2018 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 17:03, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019 suggestion

[edit]

1869 - periodic table added (as suggestion), with image. Would be first appearance I assume, because was only recently added to March 1. 2019=150th anniversary. FA periodic table does not qualify for TFA on March 1 because it was TFA a year ago, unfortunately. -DePiep (talk) 16:21, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The image of the original periodic table overlaps partially the image of TFA. Use other OTD image? -DePiep (talk) 11:14, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Howcheng please take a look. -DePiep (talk) 21:35, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
DePiep: I've swapped out the image for one of Warwick Armstrong. —David Levy 10:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 17:59, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2020 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 17:04, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021 request

[edit]

@Howcheng: can we list Vic Mitchell (b. 1934) please? Mjroots (talk) 12:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mjroots: I suggest you make the lead a bit longer. Otherwise, it looks good. howcheng {chat} 07:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Mjroots: One more thing: can you possibly get a footnote for the birth date? Thanks. howcheng {chat} 08:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Howcheng: - it's covered by reference [1], first paragraph of "Early life and career". Mjroots (talk) 08:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Mjroots: That was my assumption, but I suspect TRM will want a footnote closer to the text. howcheng {chat} 08:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Let's see, shall we? @The Rambling Man:. Mjroots (talk) 08:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If it's in footnote [1] then just re-use it at the end of the sentence containing the claim. Otherwise, OTD regardless, it's not being verified adequately. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 09:46, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with the statement that it's not being verified adequately, but I've added the additional ref anyway. Mjroots (talk) 12:27, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 notes

[edit]

Forgot the births/deaths this year again. howcheng {chat} 08:02, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2022 request

[edit]

Hi, hope this isn't too early -- I'm not very experienced with OTD. I'd like to place a nomination for Disability Day of Mourning to run if possible. It's never run OTD before (was made a few days after 1 March 2021), has no cleanup tags, is a B-class that could probably pass GAN with some work, and ran DYK when new without issues. (cc Howcheng) Vaticidalprophet 06:04, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vaticidalprophet: Looking good, but the only thing it needs is a citation for the date. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 07:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Have added, thank you! Vaticidalprophet 07:14, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 07:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]