Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/De-stubbing task force
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
| De-stubbing task force | |||||||||||||||||
|
Home | 
|
Talk | 
|
Drive | 
|
Current batch | ||||||||||
September Drive
[edit]Do you think that this task force needs a September Drive? Reaching out for your thoughts, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 00:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- That would be one way to speed things up. I'm down D-Flo27 (talk) 10:07, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Wrongful stubs
[edit]Let me get this clear. Wrongful stubs seem unfair, considering the hard work put to de-stubbing actual stubs, maybe Wrongful stubs can only give you 0.5 points instead of an actual point? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 02:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- @D-Flo27: @Sanglahi86: Pinging active contributors.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗08:46, 2 August 2024 (UTC)- Sure D-Flo27 (talk) 10:06, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, I am unfamiliar with the "points" system in this task force. If it exists however, the way I see it, if an article was wrongfully tagged a stub when it is not a stub, no points should be given. There are also several articles tagged as Start but should in fact be Stub. Sanglahi86 (talk) 12:56, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Very well, I (kind of) agree with your comment.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗12:58, 2 August 2024 (UTC) - Sorry, Wrongful stubs are stubs which should actually be start articles, so you just tag them with start.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗11:14, 3 August 2024 (UTC)- Oh ok, in that case, I would agree with your original proposal of 0.5 points for a wrongful Stub reassessment. It would be good, however, to include the definition of a "wrongful stub" in the page to avoid confusion. Sanglahi86 (talk) 16:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Very well, I (kind of) agree with your comment.
Different form
[edit]Instead of the regular find-and-fix form seen in the batch system, how about a batch system which says the de-stubbed articles, max 200, reaching out for your thoughts. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 09:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. The current find-and-fix batch is tedious to look at, since it shows you the amount of work needed, which can be overwhelming. Listing down the de-stubbed articles (probably including reassessed wrongful stubs?) would be much better in my opinion and may even encourage others to join the drive. Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:12, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Sanglahi86 I'm going to apply the procedure in Batch 2, which will hopefully be created tomorrow, anyway, what do you want to do to the remaining batch articles?
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗13:14, 6 August 2024 (UTC)- I don't know. I haven't focused on it as it overwhelms me. What is your plan in the new batch (Batch 2) that you mentioned? Do the articles have to be processed in alphabetical order or anything goes? I was thinking it was easier to list in the new list any de-stubbed article, but it may be unorganized in the long run. Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:21, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Sanglahi86 Batch 2 will be listed per date unstubbed, I thought about it and the first batch will be archived, effective tommorow.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗13:26, 6 August 2024 (UTC)- Great idea. I never thought about sorting batches by date. Will previous reassessments be included in the list? Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:35, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Sanglahi86 Yeah, (except the wrongful stubs).
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗13:53, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Sanglahi86 Yeah, (except the wrongful stubs).
- Great idea. I never thought about sorting batches by date. Will previous reassessments be included in the list? Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:35, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Sanglahi86 Batch 2 will be listed per date unstubbed, I thought about it and the first batch will be archived, effective tommorow.
- I don't know. I haven't focused on it as it overwhelms me. What is your plan in the new batch (Batch 2) that you mentioned? Do the articles have to be processed in alphabetical order or anything goes? I was thinking it was easier to list in the new list any de-stubbed article, but it may be unorganized in the long run. Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:21, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done, thank you for your cooperation.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗12:11, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Sanglahi86 I'm going to apply the procedure in Batch 2, which will hopefully be created tomorrow, anyway, what do you want to do to the remaining batch articles?