Wikipedia talk:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd/Log

Naughty log

I'm totally ignoring this. Is there a "naughty" log where I should list my unacceptable edits? Tony (talk) 03:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Nah, just pretend like this doesn't exist. We aren't really here... you've never heard of us... --Jayron32 04:35, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes, yes, we know your ignoring it. Abce2 (talk) 05:26, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Wikibooks OK?

I'll be doing a lot og gnoming in en 'books and zh 'pedia... Do they count? Kayau Odyssey HUCK FINN to the lighthouse BACK FROM EXAMS 03:33, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

yeah, but not for logging purposes here. Lets keep the log here about en.wikipedia work. --Jayron32 04:34, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK escalation process

I wanted to propose for works that were submitted to DYK's be reviewed by other admins and/or peers ASAP, especially who signed up in the dramaout? This way we could log more results to this cause and see the articles come out on the mainpage before the end of this dramaout period. --TitanOne (talk) 02:55, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

There's no rush. We can keep updating the log page long after the Dramaout ends. So, there's no need to rush through DYKs or FAs. Just update the log once it finally passes. That's what we did last time. --Jayron32 03:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh, ok. No problem then, sorry for the semi-drama. LOL. --TitanOne (talk) 03:17, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Article Incubator - quick question

How should we log work done on articles in the WP:Article Incubator? Should we just treat them like any other articles and log them under the type of improvement (expansion, cleanup etc) or should we have a separate section for Incubator work? Contains Mild Peril (talk) 05:19, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Whatever you think will work best for you. It's all good. --Jayron32 05:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Dramaout cured my Wiki-Bonk

Wow this is very relaxing, from having limited edits over the last 5 months (even 0 edits for Oct & Nov) to really pumping it up over the last few days (4 DYK's in 2 days). We should do this more often? --TitanOne (talk) 21:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

It would be nice if we did this more often. However, we didn't get nearly as much completed this year as we did last year (compare this year's log to last year's). I think if we did this more than a few times a year, participation in this event would decrease rapidly due to loss of interest. Keeping it to an annual event, I think, would be best. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 22:32, 23 January 2010 (UTC)