Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Assessment

Now what?

I've exhausted the list of assessment requests. So, is there a archive procedure that we've come up with, or do I need to hop over to WPMILHIST and figure out how they do it? --Born2flie (talk) 07:37, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Link

The backlog on this page might drop a bit if it were easier to find, perhaps by a link from the Assessments page? Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

link article template

I would like to recommend the use of the {{la}} template for including articles on this page. The syntax would be similar to that used on WP:GAN:

# {{la|Fixed-wing aircraft}} ~~~~

resulting in:

Fixed-wing aircraft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Born2flie (talk) 23:32, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problem: stub or C

In my view of how we do things here, a two-line article is in no conceivable way more than a stub. Heads up: User talk:Trevor MacInnis#Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Contest/Submissions/Zyxw. Geschichte (talk) 14:20, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Scale

I noticed that on the B-class quality scale, there are 6 criteria, but the b-class list on the WPAVIATION template only has 5 of the 6. Should this be added to the todo list for the template? Rpyle731^talk 03:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a stub?

I see Coleman A. Young International Airport and wonder if the rating of Stub is justified? Thanks for your response, XOttawahitech (talk) 19:40, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not now. It's too long for a Stub. Quick re-rate as a Start. -Fnlayson (talk) 19:50, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know

This project has been mentioned at: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Council#More_on_Project_Assessments. XOttawahitech (talk) 03:11, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]