Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals/Data

Perhaps this page should be linked to:

Antrax 14:04, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemicals/Data book and Chemistry resources

If I understand the proposal made by User:Antrax, the objective is to have all these merged under one name. However, which article should be retained and which others should be converted into re-directs has not been specified. Also, another point of debate is if this article should be in the main namespace or article namespace. Also, there can be disagreement about the merger. So, it would be great if someone can structure the discussion along these lines. I am centralising the merge discussion here to prevent cross-talk on the talkpages of other candidates for the merger. --Gurubrahma 17:24, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I support merging Chemical resources into Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemicals/Data, with a delete of Chemical resources as Wikipedia is NOT a collection of external links. Judgement reserved on the others. Physchim62 (talk) 13:01, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I agree with Physchim62. --PeR 22:59, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have merged Chemistry resources into this page, cleanup to follow. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 10:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Merge into Chemical sources

Dear all, we are busy setting up a page comparable to the Special:Booksources page, at the moment I am collecting links there, where possible deeplinks. I therefore propose to merge the data on this page into that page, and remove this page (I will copy the links that I do not have ASAP).

By the way, any help would be appreciated setting up the programming of the 'special page'. Cheers! --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 10:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removed merge .. seems not right, there are many links related to chemicals, which should be on Chemical sources, but the other links should not be. So, it needs a cleanup (hence, I put in that template). --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 18:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And Removed the cleanup template .. this page is quite OK, the other serves a different function. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 18:23, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Beetstra for your involvement!, I´ll help restructuring this part of the wiki. Antrax 15:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]