Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dinosaurs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Informal reassessment of Thescelosaurus

[edit]

Hi, I don't normally participate in dinosaur articles, but other members have brought up the idea of bringing older dinosaur GA/FA articles to modern quality standards without taking them to reassessments formally, so here's the link for participation: Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Article workshop#Thescelosaurus. PrimalMustelid (talk) 01:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like we could use an article or specific section about Dryomorpha.

[edit]

Looks like we could use an article or specific section about Dryomorpha.

Existing mentions redirect to non-specific articles.

- 189.122.84.88 (talk) 03:01, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is very little content to discuss at Dryomorpha that is not already discussed at Ornithopoda, where it redirects. IJReid {{T - C - D - R}} 03:17, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps an anchor at Ornithopoda#Taxonomy would help? Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 04:42, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dryomorpha is a node-based clade and was recently merged per a major set of changes to dinosaur taxonomy on WP. The article was a stub, had very little independent value, and did not contain any information that would not be equally easily contained within the page for Ornithopoda (WP:N, WP:REDUNDANT). There is a section on the page for Ornithopoda. A Cynical Idealist (talk) 05:08, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Sadiq Malkani up for deletion

[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Sadiq Malkani. Please participate if interested. Thanks. Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:05, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overhaul of palaeoart review pages

[edit]

For the few of you who are not already also watching the palaeoproject talk page, a discussion:[1] FunkMonk (talk) 23:25, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]