Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Society and medicine task force/Archive 1

Setting importance

The instructions say that society articles needing attention should be tagged as "high" importance and everything else tagged as mid. Under what circumstances, if any, would any articles be tagged as low importance? Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:31, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

What should be set by default (or by a bot)?

{{WikiProject Medicine | class= | importance= |society=yes |society-imp=Mid}} -DePiep (talk) 10:41, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

See WP:BOTREQUEST this one. Please follow that page. -DePiep (talk) 14:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. As this is a bot, and I think it might be useful to look at the pages at least once, I have asked for the importance to be set to ???. As I/we sift through the articles, we can change the importance to mid to indicate we have reviewed it. --LT910001 (talk) 15:16, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Get assessments starting

I have added the basic tables to the page:

• {{Articles by quality|topic=society and medicine}}
• {{Articles by Importance|topic=society and medicine}}

These two do just category counting.
To get the full table, the WP1.0 bot must be started on this taskforce/project. That did not happen yet. Run the bot. Frustrating. Maybe the lowercase in "society" may disturb things.

Add pages to the taskforce seems to be done by [1]. Did not find exactly how.

Please keep talk here. -DePiep (talk) 14:43, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

You missed out on the step of adding Category:Society and medicine articles by quality to Category:Wikipedia 1.0 assessments. I just added this, and then re-ran the update tool. So now all of the data is there, but it seems like the table on WP doesn't also get updated. Now, you just have to wait a few days for it to be run again to update the table. --Scott Alter (talk) 17:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Where did yo find that? WP1.0 "has" the worst manual of WP. IT's chasing peole away. -DePiep (talk) 01:16, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks very much to you both for you help! --LT910001 (talk) 11:41, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

About the tagging tool I asked at the village pump. -DePiep (talk) 12:27, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

There are very smart bots that can look at all MED pages intelligently for this. Ask me or the (botoperator)/botrequest page. -DePiep (talk) 15:13, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

I've set up the assessment bot a bunch of times, so I knew it needed to be done. Looking over the directions, it is noted at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Using the bot#Setting up for the bot, within the categories listed in #1. --Scott Alter (talk) 00:47, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

The assessment table now works. Apparently, the bot stopped working (see Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Index#Wikipedia:WikiProject Spaceflight is no longer updating). Regarding the table, since all of the articles have the same importance, it is not listed in the column headers. If there are more than 1 importance ratings, then you will see the importance listed in the headers. --Scott Alter (talk) 04:21, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Talk page formatting

I've setup the talk page for archival and added a {{Talkheader}} and the Medicine navigation header.

Please feel free to modify as you wish.

Cheers,

— Cirt (talk) 21:16, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposal to broaden/rename HIV/AIDS in the pornographic film industry

There is a discussion, Talk:HIV/AIDS in the pornographic film industry#Propose broaden scope and rename, that members of this project may be interested in. Lightbreather (talk) 20:57, 10 September 2014 (UTC)