Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Record Labels/Assessment
![]() | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
I think that we should give importance to to articles. My proposal:
Top priority: Those record labels which are internationally known, and have had a profound impact on the history of recorded sound. Examples: RCA Victor, Columbia, His Masters Voice.
High priority: Those record labels which are generally well known, having a long history of strong sales and musical and/or industry influence. Examples: Warner Brothers, Edison, Parlophone, Arista.
Mid priority: Those record labels having numerous hits or having a profound impact on a particular field of music. Examples: Rounder, Aladdin, Banner (1920s)
Low priority: All other notable labels.
Additional input appreciated! 78.26 (talk) 01:47, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- seeing no discussion since, I'm moving this to the project page. Further ideas welcome (and needed!) 78.26 (talk) 03:24, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Draft: Rajmuzik Studio
[edit]Hi plz review my Draft Rajmuzik Studio . If changes required plz suggest me . I wil try to give my best. I love music . 1234prifixer (talk) 15:40, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Draft Aztec Records
[edit]Hi, I would like to find people who want to collaborate in the extension of the Draft Aztec Records. There is a great list of references in the talk page, thanks--RafiUbeda (talk) 10:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)