Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types/New Zealand

This page is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles

New Zealand

This page is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles

Road stubs

@Grutness: I think you know your way around these issues. I'm wondering why New Zealand road stubs are listed under Category:Oceania road stubs, as I would have expected there to be a Category:New Zealand road stubs, just like there is an equivalent category for Australia. And the parent category for that should be Category:New Zealand transport stubs, with Category:New Zealand rail transport stubs then becoming a subcategory. Does this make sense? I believe there is a formal process for initiating stub categories, hence my call for an experienced hand. Schwede 66 19:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We could also benefit from having Category:New Zealand law stubs, and particularly Category:New Zealand case law stubs, as the parent category for the latter is huge (over 500), and a good proportion of that is NZ material. Schwede 66 19:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree (re roads), though it would empty the Oceania category almost completely. It's only recently that NZ's got over the 50-stub mark necessary for a new category (someone's been making stubs for a lot of the smaller state highways recently) which is why it's not been suggested before. I'll propose it at the stub-sorting page. Given the number of stubs it should be a formality. I hadn't noticed the law ones - I'll take a look. (By the way, in stub terms, 500's not really that big - "huge and demanding attention" is anything over 800. And there are some categories, like Category:Main-belt-asteroid stubs that are enormous and pretty much unsplittable)) Grutness...wha? 23:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]