Wikipedia talk:Wiki Ed/Northeastern Illinois University/Feminist Theory (Fall 2016)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have no clue if I am doing this correctly.

Each fact has a reliable source, also has related readings to go with. The article seemed to stay on track of the feminist art movements, and didn't stray from the topic. I wasn't distracted because the flow of the article was easy to read, due to it being in chronological order. The article stayed neutral. It discussed radical feminist art groups, but didn't seem like it was dis/favoring it. Most of the sources came from other artists, art historians, and art-focused colleges. Because of this, it doesn't seem bias, but accurate. The links I checked all worked. Nothing was plagiarized, and everything was cited or quoted properly. The article seemed to end at 2011, so I'm sure there can be some information added from the past 5 years.

My questions : What has been happening in the feminist art movement since 2011, since the article ends around that date? The first discussion of feminist art reference's Ukeles' 1969 book, but doesn't discuss what inspired her for this book. What was her "turning point" that made her turn to radical art making? Aecimaru (talk) 22:47, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]