Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-02-20/Jimbo interview

Nice work Ral! - Ta bu shi da yu 13:42, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the third sentence of Jimbo Wales' first answer read "Nor any..." rather than "Not any..."? 203.113.193.101 15:09, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's "not acceptable" about the userboxes? Curious. — Stevie is the man! ^{Talk | Work} 20:17, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The whole POV thing I'm assuming.--Lewk_of_Serthic _contrib ^talk 04:11, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good Job[edit]

Nice interview. --Lewk_of_Serthic _contrib ^talk 04:12, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

someone left a really nce mesg at wikinews version[edit]

Wikinews:Talk:An interview with Jimbo Wales#Encouraging. 199.216.246.56 18:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC) [[[user:bawolff]] not signed in][reply]

article review system[edit]

Theres a mention of a new article review system. Where is this being discussed? --Salix alba (talk) 00:17, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last I heard, the rating system had already been coded, was being tested by the devs on one of the test wikis. Raul654 00:18, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Link? Westfall 04:06, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's on some obscure off-wiki site whose URL I misplaced a while back. Personally, I wasn't impressed by it. Raul654 04:09, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The coloring[edit]

The blue and red text makes it hard to read. There's a reason all of the other text on Wikipedia is black on a light/white background. Why not just use semicolon and colon formatting to set up the questions and answers? --Cyde Weys 08:05, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I did so was because interviews, particularly ones with long questions and answers, tend to be very difficult to read. Above the first question, there's a link to a black-and-white version that I created for people who have custom formatting, or who can't read it that well in color. Ral315 (talk) 14:31, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]