Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-09-05/Everyking desysopped

Diff link wrong[edit]

The diff link in the second note is pointing to the topmost diff of the noticeboard, instead of pointing to the relevant diff. --cesarb 21:15, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed; thanks. Ral315 (talk) 23:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I feel it is wrong for this article to imply, as it does in the first paragraph, that I was conscious of the presence of personal information in the revision; although the quotes later on clarify that I was not in fact aware of this, the first paragraph is most critical and there should be no room for misconception. (Also, it is silly to include Tony's quote, which was based on the patently false premise that I actually posted the said information.) Everyking 04:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how it should be re-worded. You did discuss offering the revisions to WordBomb, and they did contain personal information. That's the only real 'fact' in the whole situation; the rest is speculation on both your part (that you wouldn't release personal info) and others' (that you're a liability, etc.) Ral315 (talk) 06:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That depends on your definition of personal information. Haukur 09:58, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think anyone's questioned that the revisions contained personal information. Ral315 (talk) 16:20, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

geni did. Haukur 16:23, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting how this is juxtaposed with Carnildo[edit]

He was re-sysopped by the ArbCom/bureaucrats without Community Consensus. It seems somewhat arbitrary who needs community consensus and who just gets it. --Tbeatty 06:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]