Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-06-07/In the news

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Discuss this story

The readability of Wikipedia does not take into account the wiki links. Thus this is not that accurate of a comparison.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:59, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another point, I would rather read something written for adults (Wikipedia) than for 15-year-olds, although we often write less clearly than we could. Maybe if we get Simple up to speed that will help too. Rich Farmbrough, 10:22, 10 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

On the other hand if being unreadable means people get their medical advice from a doctor rather than wikipedia I'm not going to worry too much.©Geni 17:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the abstract for the study; full paper should be at J Clin Oncol 28:15s, 2010 (suppl; abstr 6058). Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 21:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but the abstract was already linked under "abstract" in the next sentence. I agree though that it was a maybe a bit unwise to label the link to the press release as "study".
Regards, HaeB (talk) 14:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]