Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-07-19/Features and admins

Discuss this story

I just wanted to state again about how much I like this format. This feature has gone from being scan-worthy to being worth a thorough read. Great job, folks! - Banyan Tree 15:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've skipped reading the Signpost for weeks because watching the FAC page is about the same thing. This touch is now more interesting. I'm impressed. --Moni3 (talk) 15:34, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can only echo the above. It's flipped from being a boring list to something I can be entertained by. On a side note, I read Tarrare because of this, and I fully agree that "cat lovers may want to give this one a miss". —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 00:11, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. I have to agree, it looks awesome. I never had a problem with the old format, I always read it and didn't think there was anything wrong with it, but that didn't mean it couldn't still be improved, and this is definitely an improvement. -- œ ^™ 07:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, seresin has been doing a very good job on this for about three years, I think. This expands and modifies the structure he established. Tony (talk) 08:21, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd prefer that we continue to show all of the new featured pictures. --Tagishsimon (talk) 10:45, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What, all 23? Tony (talk) 04:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The old style was cluttered and conveyed the FP promotions in a way that was not aesthetically pleasing, something which FPs are meant to be. The old design where the images were pulled together in small thumbnails was a bit of a slap in the face to the reason they were promoted. WackyWace ^{you talkin' to me?} 12:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on the new format. May you could add a link to a google image search that somehow shows the weeks latest FPs. Their image search has recently been upgraded. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 16:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]