Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-12-13/In the news
Discuss this story
Since all the trouble, is there a possibility that the U.S. government willl block Wikipedia and other related sites? (Wikinews, Wikimedia, Wikitionary, etc.) Nascar1996 02:05, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- I seriously hope that question was in jest. Xenon54 (talk) 02:33, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Do not hold your breath. The FCC will discuss on December 20 or December 21 about Net Neutrality. This along with Wikilinks is the greatest threat to the site. I have been raising this issue of censorship that is now coming from an external level since 2007 if not earlier. It is time we go full out on all of the talk radio and othr media sites though I fear it may too little too late. Chris (talk) 03:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Seriously? The US government could not feasibly block Wikimedia projects because of Wikileaks; we are completely unrelated, and I imagine the people within Washington who deal with this know that as a fact. More importantly, I think there would be outrage in the US media if Wikipedia was blocked; as one of the most visited sites in the world we are one of the most valuable sources of information online. Certainly if Wikipedia is blocked I would be incredibly shocked. wackywace 07:33, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Given who is this government right now, most notably Cass Sunstein, don't hold your breath. Remember the First Amendment. Chris (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Your response is unclear, Chris, for two reasons: (1) I don't know what threat from the US government you mean (the Wikipedia article on Sunstein doesn't provide the needed information to explain your point), & (2) your first sentence doesn't quite make sense; I assume you left out a word or two. -- llywrch (talk) 17:34, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- llywrch, the missing information one needs to know is that Sunstein has become somewhat personally demonized to the-Feds-are-coming! crowd, because he's written some wrongheaded (IMHO) punditry about negative effects of the Internet and free speech. So to some people, his name is another word for guvmint-about-to-censor-us. I wouldn't worry about it, but then, they didn't ask me. -- Seth Finkelstein (talk) 14:59, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Your response is unclear, Chris, for two reasons: (1) I don't know what threat from the US government you mean (the Wikipedia article on Sunstein doesn't provide the needed information to explain your point), & (2) your first sentence doesn't quite make sense; I assume you left out a word or two. -- llywrch (talk) 17:34, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Given who is this government right now, most notably Cass Sunstein, don't hold your breath. Remember the First Amendment. Chris (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Seriously? The US government could not feasibly block Wikimedia projects because of Wikileaks; we are completely unrelated, and I imagine the people within Washington who deal with this know that as a fact. More importantly, I think there would be outrage in the US media if Wikipedia was blocked; as one of the most visited sites in the world we are one of the most valuable sources of information online. Certainly if Wikipedia is blocked I would be incredibly shocked. wackywace 07:33, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Do not hold your breath. The FCC will discuss on December 20 or December 21 about Net Neutrality. This along with Wikilinks is the greatest threat to the site. I have been raising this issue of censorship that is now coming from an external level since 2007 if not earlier. It is time we go full out on all of the talk radio and othr media sites though I fear it may too little too late. Chris (talk) 03:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
One of the rites of initiation of WMF staff traveling to India is to have to deal with the somewhat dysfunctional Indian media landscape. I didn't give any interviews (indeed we're explicitly declining interviews during this trip and handing people press packages instead if they are interested), but I must have had a conversation with a journalist who didn't clearly self-identify, and who cobbled together some half-understood sentence fragments into the MiD Day story. The result includes the hilarious misunderstanding re: "staff working round-the-clock keeping track of all facts". Fortunately the story is benign and benevolent, but it's bizarre to have words put in your mouth like that.--Eloquence* 18:35, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- "If something is edited to the main copy, we review each and every detail." - you're right, that's absolutely hilarious. -- Seth Finkelstein (talk) 15:13, 15 December 2010 (UTC)