Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-07-03/Arbitration report

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Discuss this story

  • The "New York Times and MSNBC were dismissed as non-RS" and as well they should have been dismissed. This is a partisan divide and a case where Wikipedia either needs to really find consensus about non-partisan journalism or adopt an "attributable point of view" policy where a case for and against can be equally discussed. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]