Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/From the archives
 | To discuss draft Signpost articles, please use the newsroom Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom(This allows for greater visibility of discussions, makes archiving easier, and prevents discussions becoming disconnected from articles during the publication process) |
 | This orphaned talk page, subpage, image page, or similar is not eligible for speedy deletion under CSD G8 as it has been asserted to be useful to Wikipedia. If you believe it should be deleted, please nominate it on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. |
Interesting.. when did we move the 'explainer' of *mboxes, to be after the bold 1 line summary, instead of below it ? Was that a conscious decision, or did it happen in refactor and no one ever noticed it ? —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 08:35, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Should note this is from last month's issue. Didn't see it in time to do much with it. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 20:51, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- And now it's two months old. Do these things never get removed? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 20:15, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi Adam, ...and the full interview is here
: the link at 'here' goes to a dab page. Is that intentional? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:02, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
C/E comment: wouldn't However, 15 years ago was also in the middle of Wikipedia's early era, when major things were happening.
sound better with an "and" replacing the second comma? — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Non nobis solum. 14:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Unsure. Slightly different emphasis. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 23:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)