Draft:Han Chinese culture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Han Chinese culture is the culture of Han Chinese people. Various parts of Han Chinese culture may be shared with other ethnic groups in China and the Sinosphere while other parts of the culture differ greatly.

Han marriage taboos[edit]

Han Chinese traditionally regard patrilineal cousin marriage between paternal relatives of the same patrilineal clan (who carry the same surname) as taboo for example, the children of two brothers marrying each other. However marriage to non-patrilineal cousins is allowed such as marriage to a father's sister's children's or children of the mother's sisters and brothers. This taboo differentiates Han people from other ethnicities such as Hui people who marry their own paternal cousins.

Han funeral practices[edit]

Han Chinese traditionally buried their dead and abhorred cremation.

Balinese women, Bugis women and other native women in Indonesia who married Han Chinese men were buried according to Chinese custom with Chinese characters on their gravestones instead of being cremated.[1]

Han patrilineal identity[edit]

The Han Chinese traditionally viewed Han as a patrilineal ethnicity traced only through the father's lineage, with all Han Chinese ultimately claiming descent from the Yellow emperor and organizing themselves in patrilineal clans. People of non-Han paternal lineages were rejected as Han which led to ethnic minorities to forge genealogies tracing ancestry to a male Han ancestor in order to attempt to pass as Han people.

A quote falsely attributed to Confucius claims that barbarians came become Chinese and Chinese could become barbarians by adopting each other's culture. This quote was actually made by Han Yu and falsely attributed to Confucius and the Classical Confucian texts which never said this and Han Yu was in fact only emphasizing one point, claiming that Buddhism, which he hated, might turn Chinese into barbarians and he was not discussing the possibility of barbarians becoming Chinese.[2][3][4][5]

Han ethnicity is traced through the father and mothers are seen as empty receptacles.[6][7][8][9][10][11]

Patricia Buckrey Ebrey showed that traditionally Han Chinese traced their ethnicity through paternal descent and not only culture or language, those with Han fathers were Han regardless of the mother's ethnicity and Han Chinese never viewed anyone as "creoles" or "half breeds", rejecting the idea of blood quantum, viewing children solely as their father's ethnicity regardless of their physicals characteristics, even if they looked mixed Eurasian or white, as long as their father was Han Chinese, they were Han.[12] Han Chinese believed that parents and children had the same blood and that they would mix together when put into water. Ebrey pointed out Han Chinese identity was affectively a massive group centered around paternal lineages and not on where someone was born, or their language or their physical looks (phenotype) but solely on their father, in contrast to western ideas about race. In order for non-Han people to claim to be Han and try to pass to assimilate, they had to fabricate genealogies tracing their paternal ancestor to a Han Chinese in order to convince other Han people that they were Han.[13] Patricia Buckrey Ebrey noted that since the Song dynasty tons of genealogies were written down, and in southern China, not a single Han Chinese ever traced their paternal ancestry from one of the local native ethnic minorities of the south, despite historical records showing that Chinese governments brought Confucian culture and beliefs to the local non-Han by opening schools. Believing in the genealogies alone as a truthful source would mean that not a single non-Han male who accepted Confucian culture ever left a descendant. Ebrey pointed out that there must have been at least some people in southern China who had native southern ethnic minority paternal origin in the Qing, Ming and Song but that they created genealogies showing northern Han Chinese ancestors who moved south in order to claim to be Han, because Han identity centered around paternal descent and not culture. Their genealogies all said their paternal ancestors were Han Chinese who came south in the Yuan, Song, Tang or Han dynasties. It was not about class but about ethnicity, since many southern Han claim ancestry from humble merchants and peasants and not only high status positions, but would never admit their paternal ancestor were natives.[14][15] Han Chinese collectively called themselves the hundred surnames and viewed themselves as a collection of paternal clans. Henan was the place of origin of the Chen surname but people with the surname Chen outside of China and in China like Hebei, Guangxi, Shaanxi, and in Fujian where most of them live today are all potentially linked by the paternal lineage.. Han Chinese paternal lineages could split apart for centuries and move to different areas but still recognized themselves as the same clan. The Han Chinese conception of ethnic identity as solely paternal meant hat Han Chinese could intermarry with non-Han women and the children would be considered Han so there was never such a concept as "half-breed" or "creole" in traditional China. So tens of thousands of people at a time could claim to be Han via just 1 Han man moving to southern China in the Song, Tang or Han dynasties.[16][17]

Han Chinese organized their polygamous families around patrilineal descent and divided their wealth among their sons.[18] Ebrey pointed out out that Han Chinese identity was constructed around patrilineal ancestry from Han and Confucianism, and that non-Han Chinese tribals had to adopt Han surnames and fabricate genealogies showing Han Chinese paternal ancestors and the legendary ancestor of all Han Chinese, the Yellow Emperor as their ultimate ancestor. It was not based on language or race.[19]

Ebrey wrote about how Han Chinese society was organized around patrilineal lineage clans with shared rites and rituals, graveyards, shared family property and wealth.[20] Han Chinese lineage are paternal clans and keeps people linked after hundreds of years of separation with communal ancestral services and rituals as ancestral temples and communal resource pooling. Sons inherit property divided from their parents which helps the government collect taxes while daughters do not receive them since they marry into other families.[21]

Late 19th century reformers like Kang Youwei and Liang Qichao did not copy word for word western racial theorists like Herbert Spencer or Charles Darwin, but simply took the word "race" and applied traditional Han Chinese definitions to the western word "race", such as merely using race as synonymous with traditional Chinese patrilineal lineages. They then compared indigenous traditional Han Chinese lineage feuding between different clans to competition between different races like red, black, browns, whites and yellows.[22]

Ebrey wrote about the ancestral halls Han Chinese built for their paternal lineages.[23]

Many Han Chinese Cantonese in the 19th century Pearl river delta had genealogies claiming their paternal ancestors migrated in the Song dynasty to Guangdong from central China, after the Southern Han was conquered by the Song dynasty, as their genealogies were examined by David Faure. There was only sea in the region in the 10th century during the Southern Han.[24][25]

Official dynastic views on Han identity[edit]

Han people originally used Hua as their endonym to call their own ethnic group. The Xianbei Tuoba wanted to make Hua into the cultural and civilisational term so they could be included under it by culture and civilisation and and make Han the ethnic term for what was previously called Hua. for The Xianbei emphasised that Han was a distinct ethnic group by blood from Xianbei, with them encouraging use of the Han term, in order to include themselves under the cultural and civilisational terms Hua and Zhongguoren while still maintaining Xianbei and Han as different ethnic identities.[26] The Manchu Yongzheng emperor maintained that Han was a distinct ethnic group and that Manchus were not assimilating into Han, saying that when using Hua as an ethnic term for Han, Manchus were not Hua, but Yi (which meant non-Hua), but only if Hua purely mean civilized and was not used as an ethnic term, then Manchus were culturally part of Hua/Zhonghua and culturally Chinese, saying "Manchu blood differs from Han blood, in the same way as Mongol and Tibetan blood too differs from Han blood", emphasising that Manchu and Han would always be different ethnic groups by blood but by culture and civilisation both Manchu and Han were Zhonghua.[27][28]

The first Ming Emperor Zhu Yuanzhang and a Ming officials quoted the Chinese classic Zuo zhuan which said "fei wo zulei, qi xin biyi" (the thoughts and feelings of those who are not of our descent group are invariable different) when they were against Han surnames being adopted by non-Han such as Mongols, and said that non-Han ethnicities and Mongols should not confuse themselves with Han by adopting Han surnames but instead take their own unique surnames. The Ming Emperor reprimanded non-Han ethnicities like Hui (seren) and Mongols for changing their original names and trying to hide their barbarian origins saying they would forget their origins in 1370. This indicated many Han were rejected the idea that non-Han could become Han solely by adopting Han culture and Confucianism, and thought only people of Han paternal descent could be Han.[29][30]

The Qing dynasty used Han as a descriptor of a coherent ethnic group apart of the Yi (barbarian) ethnic minorities of southwest China in the 19th century such as an 1803 memorial which talks about trying to differentiate Han from Yi.[31]

Paternal Descent from the Yellow Emperor[edit]

Han dynasty historian Sima Qian traced ancestry of people in China back to the Yellow Emperor and this habit in China stretched back to his time, and continued to the Qing dynasty where Han Chinese viewed him as ancestors of the Han race. Many people with the same surname and lineages traced their ancestor back to one primal ancestor, the shizu and all the branches claimed descent from them, and by analogy all Han lineages were descended from the Yellow Emperor.[32][33]

Ebrey noted that Song and Tang dynasty era genealogies and Han dynasty era genealogies (Sima Qian) claimed the Yellow emperor has their ancestor.[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]

The Yellow Emperor was claimed as the ancestor by the Song Zhenzong emperor.[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]

Contrary to the false claim that Han Chinese only started in the 20th century to claim the Yellow Emperor as ancestor, medieval Han Chinese in the Song dynasty and Tang dynasty both claimed the Five Emperors including the Yellow emperor as their paternal ancestor in genealogies as this stretched back to the Western Han dynasty with Sima Qian. Han Chinese were made out of a group of people who saw themselves as related to each other by paternal descent and descended from the Yellow Emperor. The Han dynasty Emperors claimed descent from YAo, one of the five emperors and a descendant of the Yellow Emperor. Yao and the Yellow emperor's great grandson Di Gao were claimed as paternal ancestors of a female named Liu on a grave dated to 642 and one of the Yellow Emperor's sons, Di Shaohao was claimed as paternal ancestor on Zhang Rui's grave in 632 and Yu the Great was claimed as paternal ancestors of Guan Daoai in 627 and the Yellow Emperor's grandson Di Kaoyang was claimed as paternal ancestor by Wei Kuangbo in 617. These were recorded in "Tangdai muzhiming huibian fukao" listed by Mao Hanguang in the first volume.[62][63][64]

The Chu, Zhao, Qi and Qin noble families as well as the Xia dynasty traced their ancestry from the Yellow Emperor.[65][66][67][68]

Across Guangdong, three million people surnamed Huang claim descent from the same paternal ancestor, Huang Qiaoshan who lived in the Tang dynasty and migrated to Fujian at the end of the dynasty, via three of his sons (out of 21) who founded different branches, found among the Hakka, Chaoshan and Cantonese. Among them are the Longgang, Kengxi village Hakka Huang, the Cantonese "guangfu" Huang native to Shenzhen in the villages of Shangsha & Xiasha & the Chaoshan Huang. Huang Qiaoshan lived from 872 to 953 and claimed he was the Yellow Emperor's 128th generation descendant. Huang Moutang who was born in 1183 and was Huang Qiaoshan's 15th generation descendant is the ancestor of the Cantonese guangfu Huang clans. One of his descendants was Huang Siming from whom the Xiasha Huang descent. Huang Qiaoshan's 9th generation descendant Huang Liao was a Song official and his descendant Huang Chaoxuan during the Ming-Qing transition was the ancestor of the Longgang, Kengzi village Hakka Huang. The Huang descendants who migrated and established linages in the Song were Cantonese speakers while the Huang descendants who migrated to the coast in the Ming-Qing transition spoke Hakka.[69]

Ethnic minorities forging genealogies[edit]

Di people[edit]

Lü Guang was ethnically Di (although he claimed ancestry from an ethnically Han man named Lü Wenhe (呂文和) who fled from Pei County (in modern Xuzhou, Jiangsu, the same county that Han Dynasty emperors' ancestors came) from a disaster and who settled in Di lands).

Turkic people[edit]

Non-Han Chinese like Li Bo (Li Bai) tried to appear as Han by falsely claiming Han Chinese paternal ancestors like Laozi.[70]

Non-Han Chinese in the Tang dynasty edited their genealogies to show Han surnames and paternal Han Chinese ancestors stretching back to the Han dynasty in order to portray themselves as Han. Non-Han claimed their Han ancestors long ago were people who moved off west or were captured by nomads such as Li Ling. Li Bo claimed a fictive Han ancestor who went west in his genealogy. Other non-Han traced their ancestors to the Han legendary ancestor, the Yellow Emperor.[71]

The official history Old History of the Five Dynasties stated that the Shatuo Turk Shi Jingtang's family was originally descended from Shi Que (石碏), an official of the Spring and Autumn period state Wey, through the Han prime minister Shi Fen (石奮), and further stated that Shi Fen's descendants fled west when Han fell, settling in what would eventually become Gan Prefecture (甘州, in modern Zhangye, Gansu), apparently in an attempt to try to link Shi with a Han Chinese ancestry despite the Shatuo origin.

The Shatuo Turk Liu Zhyuan claimed patrilineal Han ancestry from the Han dynasty itself.[72]

Bohai[edit]

As Balhae descendants became firmly incorporated into the apparatus of the Jin dynasty, many individual Balhae-descended officials tried to fabricate genealogies to appear as Han. In 1135, Nansali was chosen as an emissary to Goryeo, for which he changed his name to the Sinitic Wang Zheng. Wang Tingyun also invented a genealogy record on his epitaph tracing his lineage to Taiyuan rather than Liaodong. The epitaph acknowledges that his most recent ancestors were in the employ of Balhae but added that they only "lived dispersed among the eastern barbarians", rejecting his Balhae identity. The practice of inventing fictitious genealogies to hide ancestry outside of the "Central Territories" was widespread from Song times onward.[73]

Zhuang and Bouyei[edit]

The majority of Zhuang people at one point falsely claimed to be Han and grafted a Han ancestors onto their genealogies, in a Guangxi district, all 152 Zhuang clans said they were Han. The PRC government refused and rejected the Zhuang's claims to be Han and helped build the Zhuang ethnicity for these Tai speakers.[74][75][76][77] Many of the Zhuang rejected the identification as ethnic Zhuang and said they were Han in the 1950s.[78][79] Many Zhuang falsely self-identified as "Han who can speak the Zhuang language" and tried to reject the Communist party's attempt at classifying them as Zhuang and rejecting the Zhuang label in the 1953 census since they viewed being an ethnic minority as a stigma. The Communist party ignored the Zhuang objections and went ahead classifying them as Zhuang.[80][81] Many Zhuang people falsely claimed their paternal ancestors were Han Chinese from Huguang (Hubei and Hunan), Jiangnan who had migrated to Guangxi and Bouyei people in Guizhou also claimed Han Chinese Jiangnan paternal ancestry from Jiangsu.[82] Bouyei people (Zhongjia) in Guizhou and Zhuang in Guangxi tried to claim false Han paternal ancestors in order to pass as Han people, with the Bouyei making genealogies with a Han ancestors and claimed their ancestors came from Jiangnan, Hubei and Hunan (Huguang) and Shandong. The Zhuang also did this up to the 1950s and claimed their ancestors were northern Han Chinese and made fake genealogies to show it to escape marginalization and discrimination.[83] The Communists made the Zhuang self identify as Zhuang and stop pretending to be Han.[84][85]

Many ethnic minority Zhuang families in southwest China including that of Tusi chieftains fabricated genealogies claiming their paternal ancestors were northern Han Chinese.[86][87] Zhuang claimed fake Han ancestry in the Anping chiefdom.[88] Zhuang adopted Han Chinese style ancestral halls, Han ideas like fang in their lineage rules and fake Han ancestors in their genealogies.[89]

Manchu[edit]

The Manchu Duanfang of the Tohoro clan claimed his paternal ancestor was Han Chinese man surname Tao from Zhejiang when he was begging for his life from Han revolutionaries.[90][91]

During the Republic of China, a Manchu falsely claimed paternal Han origin by claiming to belong to Han Chinese President Lin Sen's clan and claiming his origin was from Minhou in Fujian and that he was from the Lin clan. Another Manchu fabricated Han background and claiming his named was Li Chengyin to get a physician's license. He was a son of Chongtai, a Qing official.[92]

Taiwan Aboriginal[edit]

The Republic of China in Taiwan formerly classified children by their father's ethnicity, children of Taiwan Aboriginal mothers and Han Chinese fathers were classified as Han while children of Han Chinese mothers and Aboriginal fathers were classified as Taiwan Aboriginals.[93] Manchus concealed their genealogies during this period.[94]

Hui and Tanka[edit]

Han Chinese also group other ethnicities based on descent alone, not by religion, economy or language, considering the descendants of foreign Muslims as Hui people and not as Han despite speaking the same language and no longer practicing Islam.[95]

The Hui Guo family of Baiqi in Quanzhou, Fujian, falsely claimed their paternal ancestor was Han Chinese general Guo Ziyi from the Tang dynasty in order to mask their Hui ethnicity.[96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105]

The Hui Ding family of Chendai in Quanzhou, Fujian, falsely claimed their paternal ancestor was Han Chinese scholar official Ding Du (an author of Wujing Zongyao from the Song dynasty in order to mask their Hui ethnicity.[106][107][108][109][110]

Hui in the Philippines are non-Muslim and they live among Catholic Filipinos in Manila and do not live among the Moro Muslims. Two Hui families in Quanzhou, Southern Fujian, the Chendai Ding family and Baiqi Guo family mostly left Islam during the Ming dynasty and the majority of their descendants practice other religions but identify as ethnically Hui and not Han, making them non-Muslim Hui. They have immigrated to the Philippines, Malaysia and Singapore and many of these overseas Ding are ashamed of having distant Islamic ancestry and don't want to talk about it. The Minnan pronunciation of Ding is Teng hence the non-Muslim Hui in the northern Philippines are surnamed Teng.[111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120]

Some of the Hui members of families that left Islam during the early Ming dynasty like the Guo of Baiqi in Quanzhou even believe negative false stereotypes about their own Muslim ancestors, with one Christian Guo saying his Hui ancestors were descendants from donkey human sexual intercourse and falsely claiming that altars with hidden images of humans having sex with donkeys were found in their temple (mosques). In the 1920s his family converted to Christianity.[121][122][123][124][125][126]

The ex-Muslim Hui masqueraded as Han for a while by claiming paternal Han descent from famous heroes like Guo Ziyi for the Baiqi Gui clan since Han ethnic identity is paternally based. The ex-Muslim Hui whose members left Islam settled overseas including Taiwan and in Manila in the Philippines where Ding Wenqi and Guo Fuyou wrote an essay attempting to falsely claim that the 5 famous Hui clans of Quanzhou that left Islam, Bai, Jin, Ma, Ding and Guo were descended from Han Chinese general Guo Ziyi and 4 of his generals Jin Zhujie, Ding Hunzhen, Ma Lin and Bai Yuanguang when he was fighting against the invading Tibetans to save Tang dynasty China and that they formed an association of 5 clans, the Qingzhen five surname association, leaving out all mention of their actual Muslim foreign origins except for the word "Qingzhen" (Halal) in the title while continuing to push the fiction that they were in China before the Yuan dynasty and that Guo was of paternal Han descent. The actual general was named Hun Zhen (Hun Jian) from the Tiele Hun tribe (the reason for his surname) and was not surnamed Ding, but the Ding concocted a fictional version of him and gave him the Ding surname to fit the fiction of four generals with the same surnames as the Hui clans in Quanzhou serving under Guo Ziyi. The members of the Ding and Guo clans on Taiwan also cling to the fictitious paternal ancestry to pretend to be Han instead of Hui.[127][128][129]

The Han Chinese official and merchant Su Tangshe who married Muslim Semu women from Pu Shougeng's family after converting to Islam was descended from Su Song according to one historian. His descendants are no longer Muslim and identify as Han due to their Han paternal ancestry and do not consider themselves Hui since their Hui ancestry is through a woman.[130][131][132][133] The Han Chinese Su family in Quanzhou regained its wealth after the Han man Su Tangshe married Hui Semu Muslim women from Pu Shougeng's family and used his family connections to Pu.[134][135][136][137]

The former Muslim Hui Ding, Jin and Guo families of Quanzhou who abandoned Islam and ethnic minorities like the She people and Tanka (Dan) people forged genealogies claiming their paternal ancestors were famous Han Chinese from northern China during the Zhou dynasty, Han dynasty or Tang dynasty who later migrated south to Fujian, in order to pass as Han people but in the modern day now acknowledge their true Hui ancestry, while the Ma family of Quanzhou proudly proclaimed their Hui origin the entire time.[138] The Hui of Quanzhou have the surnames Guo 郭, Ding 丁, Jin 金, Xia 夏, Pu 蒲, Die 迭 and Ma 馬.[139][140][141][142]

Only a few local Hui in Quanzhou still practice Islam like the Huang family, with most Muslims being Hui migrant workers from Gansu while most local Hui are non-Muslims since their ancestors left Islam centuries before like many Guo and Ding who are now Christian and other religions.[143][144][145]

A Hui Muslim descendant of Gabuman (葛卜满), an envoy of the Calicut kingdom in India, raised funds for the Fuzhou mosque in 1541 to rebuild it after a fire.

Half Tanka historian Miranda Brown (Dong Muda) tweeted about Tanka history of fabricating genealogies in an attempt to claim to be descended from northern Han.[146]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Salmon, Claudine (2016). "Ancient Chinese Cemeteries of Indonesia as Vanishing Landmarks of the Past (17th-20th c.) Anciens cimetières d'Indonésie comme jalons d'un passé en voie de disparition (xviie-xxe s.)". Chinese Deathscapes in Insulindia. 92: 23–61. doi:10.4000/archipel.282.
  2. ^ Yang, Shao-yun (2019). The Way of the Barbarians: Redrawing Ethnic Boundaries in Tang and Song China. University of Washington Press. p. 34, 35. ISBN 978-0295746012.
  3. ^ "孔子有一句话,这句话表达的意思(可以推出这个意思)是:信仰中华文化的人就是中国人,是哪一句?". 互联网. 2021-02-21.
  4. ^ "孔子有一句話,這句話表達的意思(可以推出這個意思)是:信仰中華文化的人就是中國人,是哪一句?" [Confucius has a saying, the meaning of this sentence (it can be deduced) is: People who believe in Chinese culture are Chinese. Which sentence is it?]. getit01.com (in Chinese).
  5. ^ "孔子有一句话,这句话表达的意思(可以推出这个意思)是:信仰中华文化的人就是中国人,是哪一句? - 知乎". zhihu.com.
  6. ^ Mullaney, Thomas; Bussche, Eric Armand Vanden, eds. (2012). Critical Han Studies. Global, area, and international archive. Vol. 4 on New Perspectives on Chinese Culture and Society. Univ of California Press. p. 61. ISBN 978-0520289758.
  7. ^ Teng, Emma Jinhua (2013). Eurasian: Mixed Identities in the United States, China, and Hong Kong, 1842–1943 (reprint ed.). University of California Press. p. 208. ISBN 978-0520957008.
  8. ^ Mullaney, Thomas; Bussche, Eric Armand Vanden, eds. (2012). Critical Han Studies. Global, area, and international archive. Vol. 4 on New Perspectives on Chinese Culture and Society. Univ of California Press. p. 65. ISBN 978-0520289758.
  9. ^ https://escholarship.org/content/qt07s1h1rf/qt07s1h1rf_noSplash_0a978b0ab0fd014f61fa4f28defb9767.pdf?t=ly4cw6 https://escholarship.org/content/qt07s1h1rf/qt07s1h1rf.pdf https://silo.tips/download/peer-reviewed-title-author-editor-publication-date-series-permalink-keywords-abs
  10. ^ Teng, Emma Jinhua (2013). Eurasian: Mixed Identities in the United States, China, and Hong Kong, 1842–1943 (reprint ed.). University of California Press. p. 212. ISBN 978-0520957008.
  11. ^ Mullaney, Thomas; Bussche, Eric Armand Vanden, eds. (2012). Critical Han Studies. Global, area, and international archive. Vol. 4 on New Perspectives on Chinese Culture and Society. Univ of California Press. p. 70. ISBN 978-0520289758.
  12. ^ Teng, Emma (2013). Eurasian: Mixed Identities in the United States, China, and Hong Kong, 1842–1943. A Philip e Lilienthal Book in Asian Studies (illustrated ed.). Univ of California Press. p. 215. ISBN 978-0520276277.
  13. ^ Clayton, Cathryn H. (2017). "2 Mixing blood and race : Representing Hunxue in contemporary China". In Rocha, Zarine L.; Fozdar, Farida (eds.). Mixed Race in Asia: Past, Present and Future. Routledge Research in Race and Ethnicity (illustrated ed.). Taylor & Francis. p. 44. ISBN 978-1351982481.
  14. ^ Ebrey, Patricia (2003). Women and the Family in Chinese History. Asia's Transformations/Critical Asian Scholarship (illustrated ed.). Routledge. p. 167, 168. ISBN 1134442939.
  15. ^ Ebrey, Patricia (2003). "Women and the Family in Chinese History". p. 117.
  16. ^ Ebrey, Patricia (2003). Women and the Family in Chinese History. Asia's Transformations/Critical Asian Scholarship (illustrated ed.). Routledge. p. 176. ISBN 1134442939.
  17. ^ Tsai, Chien-Hsin (2017). "Toward a Postloyal Criticism" (PDF). A Passage to China. Harvard University Asia Center. pp. 281–305. doi:10.1163/9781684175734_008. ISBN 9781684175734.
  18. ^ Duindam, Jeroen (2016). "Chapter 3 Dynasty and Elites: From Early Modern Europe to Late Imperial China". In Geevers, Liesbeth; Marini, Mirella (eds.). Dynastic Identity in Early Modern Europe: Rulers, Aristocrats and the Formation of Identities. Politics and Culture in Europe, 1650-1750 (reprint ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-1317147336.
  19. ^ Dy, Ari C. (2017). Chinese Buddhism in Catholic Philippines: Syncretism as Identity. Anvil Publishing, Inc. ISBN 978-9712732010.
  20. ^ Feuchtwang, Stephan; Bruckermann, Charlotte (2016). Anthropology Of China, The: China As Ethnographic And Theoretical Critique. World Scientific Publishing Company. p. 58. ISBN 978-1783269853.
  21. ^ Kang, Min-ping; Ding, Hung-bin (2021). "8. Paternal aunts as matriarchs in Taiwanese family businesses: An anthropological observation". In Ding, Hung-bin; Chung, Hsi-Mei; Yu, Andy; Phan, Phillip H. (eds.). Innovation, Growth, and Succession in Asian Family Enterprises. The Johns Hopkins University series on Entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 201. ISBN 978-1839104336.
  22. ^ Dikötter, Frank (2012). "Chapter Fourteen : The Discourse of Race in Twentieth-Century China". In Dikötter, Frank; Dikötter, Frank (eds.). Race and Racism in Modern East Asia: Western and Eastern Constructions. Brill's Series on Modern East Asia in a Global Historical Perspective (illustrated ed.). BRILL. p. 356. ISBN 978-9004237414.
  23. ^ Lineage Society on the Southeastern Coast of China. Cambria Press. ISBN 1621968847.
  24. ^ Miles, Steven B. (2002). "Rewriting the Southern Han (917-971): The Production of Local Culture in Nineteenth-Century Guangzhou". Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies. 62 (1): 44. doi:10.2307/4126584. JSTOR 4126584.
  25. ^ https://ur.booksc.me/book/47867358/e12a7b https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261945015_Rewriting_the_Southern_Han_917-971_The_Production_of_Local_Culture_in_Nineteenth-Century_Guangzhou https://www.academia.edu/40168962/Rewriting_the_Southern_Han_917_971_The_Production_of_Local_Culture_in_Nineteenth_Century_Guangzhou
  26. ^ Elliott, Mark (2012). "8. Hushuo The Northern Other and the Naming of the Han Chinese". In Mullaney, Thomas S.; Leibold, James; Gros, Stéphane; Bussche, Eric Vanden (eds.). Critical Han Studies The History, Representation, and Identity of China's Majority (PDF). University of California Press. p. 182.
  27. ^ Hirono, M. (2008). Civilizing Missions: International Religious Agencies in China. Culture and Religion in International Relations (illustrated ed.). Springer. p. 48. ISBN 978-0230616493.
  28. ^ "Civilizing Missions: International Religious Agencies in China (Culture and Religion in International Relations) [PDF] [2afeje698d3g]".
  29. ^ Ebrey, Patricia (2003). Women and the Family in Chinese History. Asia's Transformations/Critical Asian Scholarship (illustrated ed.). Routledge. p. 170. ISBN 1134442920.
  30. ^ China Research Monographs, Issue 46. Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley, Center for Chinese Studies. 1996. p. 25. ISBN 1557290482.
  31. ^ Critical Han Studies. Global, area, and international archive. Vol. 4 of New Perspectives on Chinese Culture and Society. Univ of California Press. 2012. p. 199, 200. ISBN 978-0520289758.
  32. ^ Chow, Kai-wing (1997). Frank, Dikötter (ed.). The Construction of Racial Identities in China and Japan: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. UPCC book collections on Project MUSE. University of Hawaii Press. p. 47, 48. ISBN 0824819195.
  33. ^ Grosby, Steven; Leoussi, Athena S., eds. (2004). Nationality and Nationalism. Bloomsbury Academic. p. 150. ISBN 1860647103.
  34. ^ Joniak-Luthi, Agnieszka (2015). The Han: China's Diverse Majority. Studies on Ethnic Groups in China (reprint ed.). University of Washington Press. p. 150. ISBN 978-0295805979.
  35. ^ Hanson, Marta (2012). Speaking of Epidemics in Chinese Medicine: Disease and the Geographic Imagination in Late Imperial China. Needham Research Institute Series (illustrated ed.). Routledge. p. 230. ISBN 978-1136816420.
  36. ^ Ebrey, Patricia Buckley (2014). Emperor Huizong (illustrated, reprint ed.). Harvard University Press. p. 302. ISBN 978-0674726420.
  37. ^ Ebrey, Patricia Buckley (2008). Accumulating Culture: The Collections of Emperor Huizong. China Program book (illustrated ed.). University of Washington Press. p. 489. ISBN 978-0295987781.
  38. ^ Ebrey, Patricia Buckley; Bickford, Maggie, eds. (2006). Emperor Huizong and Late Northern Song China: The Politics of Culture and the Culture of Politics. Vol. 266 of Harvard East Asian monographs. Harvard University Asia Center. ISBN 9780674020.
  39. ^ Ebrey, Patricia Buckley (2009). Chinese Civilization: A Sourcebook, 2nd Ed. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1439188392.
  40. ^ Little, Stephen; Eichman, Shawn; Shipper, Kristofer; Buckley, Patricia Buckley (2000). Taoism and the Arts of China (illustrated ed.). University of California Press. p. 157. ISBN 0520227859.
  41. ^ Brown, Miranda (2015). The Art of Medicine in Early China: The Ancient and Medieval Origins of a Modern Archive (illustrated ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1107097056.
  42. ^ Ebrey, Patricia (2003). Women and the Family in Chinese History. Asia's Transformations/Critical Asian Scholarship (illustrated ed.). Routledge. p. 190. ISBN 1134442920.
  43. ^ Goldschmidt, Asaf (2008). The Evolution of Chinese Medicine: Song Dynasty, 960–1200. Needham Research Institute Series (illustrated ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-1134091805.
  44. ^ Sivin, Nathan (2015). Health Care in Eleventh-Century China (illustrated ed.). Springer. ISBN 978-3319204277.
  45. ^ Hu, Fuchen (2013). General Theory of Taoism. Paths International Ltd. p. 212. ISBN 978-1844640959.
  46. ^ Ebrey, Patricia Buckley (2014). Emperor Huizong (illustrated, reprint ed.). Harvard University Press. p. 133. ISBN 978-0674726420.
  47. ^ Bauer, Susan Wise (2010). The History of the Medieval World: From the Conversion of Constantine to the First Crusade (illustrated ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. p. 571. ISBN 978-0393059755.
  48. ^ Haar, B. J. ter (2017). Guan Yu: The Religious Afterlife of a Failed Hero (illustrated ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 68. ISBN 978-0198803645.
  49. ^ A History of Daoism and the Yao People of South China. Cambria Press. ISBN 1621969975.
  50. ^ Kaziewicz, Julia (2016). Study and Teaching Guide: The History of the Medieval World: A curriculum guide to accompany The History of the Medieval World. Peace Hill Press. ISBN 978-1942968481.
  51. ^ Lagerwey, John (2018). Paradigm Shifts in Early and Modern Chinese Religion: A History. Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 4 China. BRILL. p. 134. ISBN 978-9004385726.
  52. ^ Ebrey, Patricia (2014). "Song Government Policy". In Marsone, Pierre; Lagerwey, John (eds.). Modern Chinese Religion I (2 vols.): Song-Liao-Jin-Yuan (960-1368 AD). Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 4 China (revised ed.). BRILL. p. 82. ISBN 978-9004271647.
  53. ^ Deng, Xiaonan (2021). The Ancestors' Instructions Must Not Change: Political Discourse and Practice in the Song Period. Brill's Humanities in China Library. BRILL. ISBN 978-9004473270.
  54. ^ Anderson, James A. (2012). The Rebel Den of Nung Trí Cao: Loyalty and Identity along the Sino-Vietnamese Frontier. University of Washington Press. p. 61.
  55. ^ Kuhn, Dieter (2011). The Age of Confucian Rule: The Song Transformation of China. History of imperial China. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674062023.
  56. ^ Haar, Barend J. ter (2017). Guan Yu: The Religious Afterlife of a Failed Hero. Oxford University Press. p. 67. ISBN 978-0192525420.
  57. ^ Beck, B.J. Mansvelt (2022). The Treatises of Later Han: Their Author, Sources, Contents and Place in Chinese Historiography. Sinica Leidensia. BRILL. p. 295. ISBN 978-9004482845.
  58. ^ Csikszentmihalyi, Mark (1994). Emulating the Yellow Emperor: The Theory and Practice of Huanglao, 180-141 B.C.E. Stanford University. p. 146.
  59. ^ Foster, Robert (2018). "12 The Southern Song dynasty". In Xiong, Victor Cunrui; Hammond, Kenneth J. (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Imperial Chinese History (illustrated ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-1317538226.
  60. ^ Zhang, Hanmo (2018). Authorship and Text-making in Early China. Vol. 2 of Library of Sinology [LOS]. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. p. 1. ISBN 978-1501505195.
  61. ^ Shi, Jinbo (2021). Li, Hansong (ed.). The Economy of Western Xia: A Study of 11th to 13th Century Tangut Records. Asian Studies E-Books Online, Collection 2021, ISBN: 9789004439979. Translated by Hansong Li (illustrated ed.). Brill. ISBN 978-9004461291.
  62. ^ Ebrey, Patricia Buckley (2003). illustrated, reprint (ed.). Women and the Family in Chinese History. Asia's Transformations/Critical Asian Scholarship Series. Psychology Press. p. 171. ISBN 0415288231.
  63. ^ Tippett, Maria (2010). EATING BITTER: A CHINESE-AMERICAN SAGA. X libris Corporation. p. 36. ISBN 978-1453516911.
  64. ^ China Research Monographs, Issue 46. Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley, Center for Chinese Studies. 1996. p. 26. ISBN 1557290482.
  65. ^ Qu, Yuan (2011). The Songs of the South: An Ancient Chinese Anthology of Poems By Qu Yuan And Other Poets. Penguin UK. ISBN 978-0141971261.
  66. ^ Jiang, Qing (2016). Bell, Daniel A.; Fan, Ruiping (eds.). A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China's Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future. Volume 4 of The Princeton-China Series (reprint ed.). Princeton University Press. p. 224. ISBN 978-0691173573.
  67. ^ Pan, Lynn (1994). Sons of the Yellow Emperor: A History of the Chinese Diaspora (illustrated, reprint ed.). Kodansha International. ISBN 1568360320.
  68. ^ Zarrow, Peter (2006). China in War and Revolution, 1895-1949. Asia's Transformations (illustrated ed.). Routledge. p. 69. ISBN 1134219776.
  69. ^ Guo, Man; Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten (2019). "Exploring Extended Kinship in Twenty-First-Century China: A Conceptual Case Study". Journal of Current Chinese Affairs. 48 (1): 50–75.
  70. ^ Abramson, Marc S. (2011). Ethnic Identity in Tang China. Encounters with Asia. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 151. ISBN 978-0812201017.
  71. ^ Lewis, Mark Edward (2012). China's Cosmopolitan Empire: The Tang Dynasty. History of Imperial China (illustrated ed.). Harvard University Press. p. 200, 201, 202. ISBN 978-0674054196.
  72. ^ According to Old History of the Five Dynasties, vol. 99, and New History of the Five Dynasties, vol. 10. Liu Zhiyuan was of Shatuo origin. According to Wudai Huiyao, vol. 1 Liu Zhiyuan's great-great-grandfather Liu Tuan (劉湍) (titled as Emperor Mingyuan posthumously, granted the temple name of Wenzu) descended from Liu Bing (劉昞), Prince of Huaiyang, a son of Emperor Ming of Han
  73. ^ Sloane, Jesse D. (2014), Mapping a Stateless Nation: "Bohai" Identity in the Twelfth to Fourteenth Centuries, pp. 390–391
  74. ^ Ramsey, S. Robert (1989). The Languages of China. Princeton paperbacks (illustrated, reprint ed.). Princeton University Press. p. 167. ISBN 069101468X.
  75. ^ https://canvas.uw.edu/courses/1318837/files/58355990/download?verifier=ZnqNt1M3EX14C0aR1bfCW0OkAe2vaDu9LiYoV1uH&wrap=1
  76. ^ Grey, Alexandra (25 January 2017). How do language rights affect minority languages in China? An ethnographic investigation of the Zhuang minority language under conditions of rapid social change (This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy). Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia. p. 82.
  77. ^ https://www.languageonthemove.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Grey_Zhuang_language_rights.pdf
  78. ^ Kao, Ya-ning (2019). "Ritual Practices and Networks of Zhuang Shamans". In Katz, Paul R.; Travagnin, Stefania (eds.). Key Concepts in Practice. Vol. 79 of Religion and Society. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. p. 180. doi:10.1515/9783110547849-008. ISBN 978-3110547849.
  79. ^ Katz, Paul R; Travagnin, Stefania (2019). "Concepts and Methods for the Study of Chinese Religions III: Key Concepts in Practice 3110546914, 9783110546910". dokumen.pub. Retrieved 2024-02-12.
  80. ^ Scott, James C. (2009). The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. Yale Agrarian Studies Series (unabridged ed.). Yale University Press. p. 249. ISBN 978-0300156522.
  81. ^ https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/james-c-scott-the-art-of-not-being-governed https://m.douban.com/book/review/8017649/
  82. ^ Weinstein, Jodi L. (2013). Empire and Identity in Guizhou: Local Resistance to Qing Expansion. Studies on Ethnic Groups in China (illustrated, reprint ed.). University of Washington Press. p. 44. ISBN 978-0295804811.
  83. ^ Weinstein, Jodi L. (2013). Empire and Identity in Guizhou: Local Resistance to Qing Expansion. Studies on Ethnic Groups in China (illustrated, reprint ed.). University of Washington Press. p. 20, 21. ISBN 978-0295804811.
  84. ^ Han, Xiaorong (2014). Red God: Wei Baqun and His Peasant Revolution in Southern China, 1894 1932. SUNY series in Chinese Philosophy and Culture (illustrated ed.). SUNY Press. p. 247. ISBN 978-1438453835.
  85. ^ Comprehensive Geographic Information Systems. Contributor Bo Huang. Elsevier. 2017. p. 162. ISBN 978-0128047934.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  86. ^ Holm, David (2013). Mapping the Old Zhuang Character Script: A Vernacular Writing System from Southern China. Vol. 28 of Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 4 China (illustrated ed.). BRILL. p. 778. ISBN 978-9004223691.
  87. ^ Yao, Alice (2016). The Ancient Highlands of Southwest China: From the Bronze Age to the Han Empire. Oxford studies in the archaeology of ancient states (illustrated ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-0199367344.
  88. ^ Took, Jennifer (2005). A Native Chieftaincy in Southwest China: Franchising a Tai Chieftaincy Under the Tusi System of Late Imperial China. Vol. 70 of Sinica Leidensia (illustrated ed.). BRILL. p. 259. ISBN 9004147977.
  89. ^ Took, Jennifer (2005). A Native Chieftaincy in Southwest China: Franchising a Tai Chieftaincy under the Tusi System of Late Imperial China. Sinica Leidensia. BRILL. p. 99. ISBN 904741571X.
  90. ^ Edward J. M. Rhoads (2001). Manchus & Han: ethnic relations and political power in late Qing and early republican China, 1861-1928 (reprint, illustrated ed.). University of Washington Press. p. 55. ISBN 0295980400. Retrieved March 2, 2012. The ancestors of the post-Boxer official Duanfang, for example, were Han Chinese from Zhejiang who, when they moved to southern Manchuria in the late Ming, became subjects of the Qing and were enrolled in the Manchu Plain White Banner; they then Manchufied their surname from Tao to Tohoro (Tuohuoluo in Chinese).
  91. ^ Hummel, Arthur W. Sr., ed. (1943). "Tuan-fang" . Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing Period. United States Government Printing Office.
  92. ^ Shan, Patrick Fuliang (2015). "Chapter 2 Elastic Self-consciousness and the Reshaping of Manchu Identity". In Li, Xiaobing; Shan, Patrick Fuliang (eds.). Ethnic China: Identity, Assimilation, and Resistance (illustrated ed.). Lexington Books. p. 42. ISBN 978-1498507295.
  93. ^ Martin, Steven Andrew. 台灣原住民之民族史觀 : 以布農族內本鹿為例 Ethnohistorical Perspectives of the Bunun: A Case Study of Laipunuk, Taiwan (國立政治大學社科院台灣研究碩士學程 Master’s Program in Taiwan Studies College of Social Sciences National Chengchi University 碩士論文 Master’s Thesis). p. 10.
  94. ^ Rhoads, Edward J. M. (2017). Manchus and Han: Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861-1928. Studies on Ethnic Groups in China. University of Washington Press. p. 270. ISBN 978-0295997483.
  95. ^ Gladney, Dru C. (2004). Dislocating China: Muslims, Minorities, and Other Subaltern Subjects. University of Chicago Press. p. 10. ISBN 0226297764.
  96. ^ Gladney, Dru C. (1991). Muslim Chinese: Ethnic Nationalism in the People's Republic (2, illustrated ed.). Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University. p. 279. ISBN 0674594959. ISSN 0073-0483.
  97. ^ Gransow, Bettina; Nyíri, Pál; Fong, Shiaw-Chian, eds. (2005). China: New Faces of Ethnography. Berliner China-Hefte. Vol. 28 of New Faces of Ethnography Chinese History and Society Series (illustrated ed.). International Specialized Book Service Incorporated. p. 126. ISBN 3825888061.
  98. ^ Abt, Oded (2014). "Muslim Ancestor, Chinese Hero or Tutelary God Changing Memories of Muslim Descendants in China, Taiwan and the Philippines". Asian Journal of Social Science. 42: 747–776. doi:10.1163/15685314-04206004.
  99. ^ Abt, Oded (2014). "Muslim Ancestor, Chinese Hero or Tutelary God: Changing Memories of Muslim Descendants in China, Taiwan and the Philippines". Asian Journal of Social Science. 42 (6): 747–776. doi:10.1163/15685314-04206004. JSTOR 43495836.
  100. ^ Abt, Oded (欧克德) (2015). "Chinese Rituals for Muslim Ancestors :Southeast China's Lineages of Muslim Descent" (PDF). Review of Religion and Chinese Society. 2: 216–240. doi:10.1163/22143955-00202004.
  101. ^ Oded, Abt (欧克德) (2015). "Chinese Rituals for Muslim Ancestors". Review of Religion and Chinese Society. 2 (2): 216–240. doi:10.1163/22143955-00202004.
  102. ^ BUGNON, Pascale (27–29 November 2019). "Conference Presentation Reference Religious blending along the Maritime Silk Roads : the case of Muslim's descendants in Baiqi village (Quanzhou City, China)" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  103. ^ Gladney, Dru C (February 1991). "Contemporary Ethnic Identity Of Muslim Descendants Along the Chinese Maritime Silk Route". International Seminar for UNESCO Integral Study of the Silk Roads: Roads of Dialogue “China and the Maritime Silk Route”.: 13, 21, 24.
  104. ^ Gladney, Dru C. (1996). Muslim Chinese: Ethnic Nationalism in the People's Republic (illustrated ed.). Harvard Univ Asia Center. p. 440. ISBN 0674594975. ISSN 0073-0483.
  105. ^ Fan, Ke. "Ethnic Evolvement in a South Fujian Hui Community" (PDF). Berliner China Hefte. 26: 5.
  106. ^ 海上丝绸之路研究, Issue 1. Contributors 中国与海上丝绸之路研究中心, 福建省海上丝绸之路研究会, École française d'Extrême-Orient Fuzhou Centre. 福建教育出版社. 1997. p. 70. ISBN 7533425073.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  107. ^ LU, Yun. "MUSLIM DESCENDANTS OF CLAN DING IN CHENDAI" (PDF). China Maritime Silk Route Studies Centre: 3. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  108. ^ Abt, Oded (January 2012). Muslim Ancestry and Chinese Identity in Southeast China (PDF) (THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE “DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY”). Tel Aviv University The Lester & Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities School of Historical Studies.
  109. ^ Li, Guotong (June 2016). "Transforming Islamic Customs with Confucian Rituals:Flexible Identities of the Muslim Ding Family in Late Ming Quanzhou". 明代研究 (Ming Dynasty Studies) (第二十六期 (26)): 146.
  110. ^ Abt, Oded (14 Feb 2013). "Nation, Ethnicity and Lineage Historical Memories of Zheng He in Fujian". Ming Qing Yanjiu. 18: 159–189. doi:10.1163/24684791-90000451.
  111. ^ Chu, Richard (2010). Chinese and Chinese Mestizos of Manila: Family, Identity, and Culture, 1860s-1930s. Chinese Overseas. BRILL. p. 431. ISBN 978-9047426851. Destination, selection and turnover among Chinese migrants to Philippine cities in the nineteenth century. Journal of Historical Geography 12(4): ... Traditionalism and identity politics among the Ding Hui community in southern Fujian.
  112. ^ Hefner, Robert W. (2018). Market Cultures: Society And Morality In The New Asian Capitalisms. Routledge. p. 114. ISBN 978-0429967603. He obtains the materials from a distant relative in the Philippines. His youngest son and wife live on the second floor. His oldest son, wife, and two children live on the third floor (as a Hui, Ding's son is allowed to have two ...
  113. ^ Gladney, Dru C. (1996). Muslim Chinese: Ethnic Nationalism in the People's Republic (illustrated ed.). Harvard Univ Asia Center. p. 277. ISBN 0674594975. ISSN 0073-0483. mainly in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Singapore - a higher proportion than among their Han neighbors . ... These government subsidies and special benefits are important factors in the Ding Hui claim to ethnic minority status.
  114. ^ Gladney, Dru C. (2004). Dislocating China: Muslims, Minorities, and Other Subaltern Subjects. University of Chicago Press. p. 296. ISBN 0226297756. third floor ( as a Hui, Ding's son is allowed to have two children ). ... Over 50 percent of the Ding lineage members have overseas relatives - mainly in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Singapore – a higher proportion than among ...
  115. ^ Ma, Jianxiong; Abt, Oded; Yao, Jide, eds. (2020). Islam and Chinese Society: Genealogies, Lineage and Local Communities. The Historical Anthropology of Chinese Society Series (illustrated ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-1000047455. ... Taiwan and the Philippines." Asian Journal of Social Science, 42(5): 747– 776. Baiqi Guoshi Huizu Zongpu Revision Editorial Committee (Ed.). 2000. Baiqi Guoshi Huizu zongpu [Genealogy of the Hui clan of Guo of Baiqi]. 3 vols.
  116. ^ Nabhan, Gary Paul (2020). Cumin, Camels, and Caravans: A Spice Odyssey. Vol. 45 of California Studies in Food and Culture (illustrated ed.). Univ of California Press. p. 230. ISBN 978-0520379244. ... Ming resources to finance some of the first openly public mosques constructed in the harbors of Sumatra, Java, Malacca, the Philippines, and India. ... But direct contact between the Ding Hui of the eastern seacoast of China and the ...
  117. ^ Elizalde, María Dolores; Wang, Jianlang, eds. (2017). China's Development from a Global Perspective. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 85. ISBN 978-1527504172. Qin Ding Da Qing Hui Dian Shi Li. 1899. Majul, Cesar Adib. "Islam in the Philippines and Its China Link." Asia Studies 46 (2010): 1–16. Majul, Cesar Adib. Muslims in the Philippines. Quezon City: The University of the Philippines Press, ...
  118. ^ Ke, Fan (2006). "2 Traditionalism and Identity Politics among the Ding Hui Community in Southern Fujian Fan Ke". In Tan, Chee-Beng (ed.). Southern Fujian: Reproduction of Traditions in Post-Mao China. Academic monograph on anthropology (illustrated ed.). Chinese University Press. p. 57. ISBN 9629962330. ... Hong Kong, the Philippines, and the home community.14 The second contribution was the regrouping of the ancestral graves Traditionalism and Identity Politics among the Ding Hui Community 57.
  119. ^ Tuan, Iris H.; Chang, Ivy I-Chu, eds. (2018). Transnational Performance, Identity and Mobility in Asia. Springer. p. xiv. ISBN 978-9811071072. Left to right: Cosette (Qin Ziran), Jean Val Jean (Ding Hui), Mme. Thenarnier (Zhang Shuhui) ... Japan and Korea are at the bottom, Philippines at the center, Bali and Java are at the top of the map. Ruin of the copper refinery, ...
  120. ^ Historical Abstracts: Modern history abstracts, 1775-1914. Part A, Volume 48, Issues 1-2. Contributor American Bibliographical Center. American Bibliographical Center, CLIO. 1997. p. 335. Ding Baozhen . Local Government ( gongju ) . Tax reform . 19c . 1115a Government . Reform . Xiliang . 1903-07 . ... Philippines . 19c - 20c . 1310a Discrimination . Labor . South Africa . 1652-1910 . 904a Chinese Studies .{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  121. ^ Gladney, Dru C. (1996). Muslim Chinese: Ethnic Nationalism in the People's Republic (illustrated ed.). Harvard Univ Asia Center. p. 272. ISBN 0674594975. ISSN 0073-0483. mainly in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Singapore - a higher proportion than among their Han neighbors. ... These government subsidies and special benefits are important factors in the Ding Hui claim to ethnic minority status.
  122. ^ Gladney, Dru C. (2004). Dislocating China– Reflections on Muslims, Minorities, and Other Subaltern Subjects. C. Hurst & Co. Publishers. p. 116. ISBN 1850653240. Reflections on Muslims, Minorities, and Other Subaltern Subjects Dru C. Gladney ... a member of a branch of the Guo lineage that had converted to Christianity in the 1920s, long after they had assimilated to Fujianese folkways, and he ...
  123. ^ Gladney, Dru C. (1996). Muslim Chinese– Ethnic Nationalism in the People's Republic. Harvard University Asia Center E-Book Collection (illustrated ed.). Harvard Univ Asia Center. p. 272. ISBN 0674594975. ISSN 0073-0483. Ethnic Nationalism in the People's Republic Dru C. Gladney ... This fantastic tale is highly suspect, since the Hui who related it was a member of a branch of the Guo lineage which had converted to Christianity in the 1920s ...
  124. ^ Lipman, Jonathan N. (2011). Familiar Strangers– A History of Muslims in Northwest China. Studies on Ethnic Groups in China. University of Washington Press. p. 214. ISBN 978-0295800554. Both the formerly Muslim Guo family of northern Taiwan, described by Barbara Pillsbury, and the Ding clan of descendants of Quanzhou Muslims, whose partial reIslamicization is narrated by Dru Gladney, illustrate what can happen in the ...
  125. ^ Israeli, Raphael (2002). Islam in China– Religion, Ethnicity, Culture, and Politics (reprint ed.). Lexington Books. p. 329. ISBN 0739156616. Religion, Ethnicity, Culture, and Politics Raphael Israeli. Geomancy, 16, 31, 304 Georgia, 58 Gladney, Dru, 266, 271—73 God/Shangdi, 76, 91, 100, 116, 157, 173, 175—76, 226, 228, 233—34; Chinese, 31, 34—35, 37—38, 62, 77; Muslim, 15, ...
  126. ^ Association for Asian Studies, Far Eastern Association (U.S.) (1987). The Journal of Asian Studies, volume 46. Association for Asian Studies. p. 499. They thus found themselves in the position of recognizing as Hui people who raised pigs, knew little of Islam ... ethnic group and the Islamic religion, it was a source of embarrassment and tension for many conservative Hui Muslims.
  127. ^ Abt, Oded (2014). "Muslim Ancestor, Chinese Hero or Tutelary God: Changing Memories of Muslim Descendants in China, Taiwan and the Philippines". Asian Journal of Social Science. 42 (6): 747–76. doi:10.1163/15685314-04206004. JSTOR 43495836.
  128. ^ Abt, Oded (2014). "Muslim Ancestor, Chinese Hero or Tutelary God" (PDF). Asian Journal of Social Science. 42 (6): 747–776. doi:10.1163/15685314-04206004.
  129. ^ DONOSO, ISAAC (2015). "The Philippines and Al-Andalus Linking the Edges of the Classical Islamic World". Philippine Studies: Historical & Ethnographic Viewpoints. 63 (2): 247–73. doi:10.1353/phs.2015.0011. JSTOR 24672336. S2CID 127539576.
  130. ^ Chaffee, John (2006). "Diasporic Identities in the Historical Development of the Maritime Muslim Communities of Song-Yuan China". Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient. 49 (4, Maritime Diasporas in the Indian Ocean and East and Southeast Asia (960-1775)): 395–420. doi:10.1163/156852006779048408. JSTOR 25165167.
  131. ^ Harris, Ron (2020). "6 Family Firms in Three Regions". Going the Distance: Eurasian Trade and the Rise of the Business Corporation, 1400-1700. The Princeton Economic History of the Western World. Vol. 82. Princeton University Press. p. 181. doi:10.1515/9780691185804. ISBN 9780691150772.
  132. ^ Chaffee, John (2018). "4 The Mongols and Merchant Power". The Muslim Merchants of Premodern China: The History of a Maritime Asian Trade Diaspora, 750–1400. New Approaches to Asian History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 154-155. doi:10.1017/9780511998492.008. ISBN 9781107012684.
  133. ^ Abt, Oded (January 2012). Muslim Ancestry and Chinese Identity in Southeast China (PDF) (THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE “DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY”). Tel Aviv University : The Lester & Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities School of Historical Studies. p. 41.
  134. ^ Harris, Ron (2020). "6 Family Firms in Three Regions". Going the Distance: Eurasian Trade and the Rise of the Business Corporation, 1400-1700. Vol. 82 of The Princeton Economic History of the Western World (illustrated ed.). Princeton University Press. p. 181. ISBN 978-0691185804. In 1351, at the time of Su Tangshe's death, he owned lands, groves, and a formidable fortune. This suggests that the recovery of that branch of the Su ...
  135. ^ "Going the Distance: Eurasian Trade and the Rise of the Business Corporation, 1400-1700 (The Princeton Economic History of the Western World) 2019016740, 9780691150772, 9780691185804".
  136. ^ Harris, Ron (2020). Going the Distance. doi:10.23943/princeton/9780691150772.001.0001. ISBN 9780691150772.
  137. ^ Abt, Oded (January 2012). Muslim Ancestry and Chinese Identity in Southeast China (PDF) (DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY). THE SENATE OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY.
  138. ^ Abt, Oded (January 2012). Muslim Ancestry and Chinese Identity in Southeast China (PDF) (THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE “DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY”). Tel Aviv University : The Lester & Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities School of Historical Studies. p. 174-179.
  139. ^ Chan, Hok-Lam (2017). Li Chih 1527-1602 in Contemporary Chinese Historiography: New light on his life and works. Routledge Revivals (annotated ed.). Routledge. p. 50. ISBN 978-1351711791. 34 Tieh was TT[one of the] prominent clans in ChTiian Prefecture. There were five clans such as the Chin, Ting, Ma•禹,Tieh, and Hsia 复;they all adopted the heretical Ma^馬[i.e. Moslem] religion /^5 and were sinicized Western Asians.
  140. ^ Chinese Studies in History, Volume 13. Contributor International Arts and Sciences Press. M.E. Sharpe. 1980. p. 50. ISBN 087332160X. 32 In the Ming dynasty, P'u was one of the many clans that was suppressed politically by Ming T'ai - tsu [ * 7, r . ... There were five clans such as the Chin, Ting, Ma, Tieh, and Hsia 夏; ; they all adopted the heretical ...{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  141. ^ Papers on Far Eastern History, Volumes 17-18. Contributor Australian National University. Department of Far Eastern History. Department of Far Eastern History, Australian National University. 1978. p. viii. ( af ) Tieh was " ( one of the ) big clans in the Ch'üan prefecture. There were five clans such as the Chin, Ting ( 117 ), Ma, Tieh, and Hsia ( 118 ) ; they all adopted the heretical Ma ( 119 ) ( i.e. Moslem ) religion " ...{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  142. ^ "百度百科-验证".
  143. ^ Ma, Te (Feb 5, 2018). "Unearthing the Islamic Relics of China's Medieval Port City". Sixth Tone.
  144. ^ https://www.openj-gate.com/quanzhou-history
  145. ^ Yuan, Ye; Nie, Yiming (Jul 6, 2021). "With Quanzhou, China Set to Add Another World Heritage Site". Sixth Tone.
  146. ^ https://twitter.com/Dong_Muda/status/1608111265645297664