MediaWiki talk:Abusefilter-warning

This interface message or skin may be documented on MediaWiki.org or translatewiki.net.
The page forms part of the MediaWiki interface, and can only be edited by administrators and interface editors.
To request a change to the page, add {{edit fully-protected}} to this page, followed by a description of your request. Consider announcing discussions you add here at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) to bring more people to the discussion.

Warning: An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive. Please be aware that vandalism may result in revocation of your editing privileges. If this edit is constructive, please report this error.

Message is the same, except I included a link to the WP:VAND page as this adds more context to the message. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 21:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you. - Rjd0060 (talk) 22:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

General warning[edit]

Isn't this the general warning? Re [1] and [2]. –xeno ^talk 18:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. This is a very easy mistake to make, as clicking "Create/edit selected message" for the first time defaults to editing the generic message. I've created {{Editnotices/Page/MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning}} to hopefully prevent further mishaps. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 20:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 10 December 2021[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

"Edit" should be changed to "$1" to match the action that the user took (move, createaccount, etc.) — Ethan Gaming 7640, Counter-Vandalism Unit 15:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done @EthanGaming7640: that wouldn't really work with the rest of the message (say it was for newaccount, why would you click publish then?) - but moreso because this generic message shouldn't be on the filters that are for moves or new accounts already - can you point to some specific examples where this is being used? — xaosflux ^Talk 15:49, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 6 March 2024[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I think that "revocation of your editing privileges" should be changed to "being blocked from editing."

Example:

Warning: An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive. Please be aware that vandalism may result in being blocked from editing. If this edit is constructive, please click 'Publish changes' again, and report this error.

Tw294 (talk) 19:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You neglected to explain why you think this should be changed — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, pending explanation. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]