Talk:Åndalsnes Station

Åndalsnes Station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 20, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 35, 2013

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Åndalsnes Station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Eisfbnore ^talk 17:26, 19 June 2011 (UTC) Overall, this is a very short and sweet article with few outstanding problems. A few comments:[reply]

Opening sentence: "Åndalsnes Station […] is a railway station at Åndalsnes in Rauma, Norway." – is "at" the correct preposition here?
- I was trying to avoid a double in, and to be honest I not sure if it is grammatically correct or not. Reworded. ¨Arsenikk ^(talk)
"It has been the terminal station of the Rauma Line since the station opened on 30 November 1924." – perhaps say that the line opened on that date.
- Yes. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"In addition to a station building, the station has an engine shed; it also acts as a bus station and is located next to a cruise ship port." – confusing - is it the station building or the engine shed which acts as a bus station?
- The lesson here it to not copyedit late at night. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"In 1912, test were done" – please fix the grammer.
"…the water system was not opened until 10 February 1925.[7] From 29 November 1924, Norsk Spisevognselskap established a restaurant in the station." – Again, the prepositions seem wrong. I would swap "until" for "before" and "from" for "on". But perhaps I'm wrong.
- Pretty sure until is correct, but the latter sentence was incorrect. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Åndalsnes Station was taken into use on 30 November 1924" – "opened" or "brought into use" would fit better.
- Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Åndalsnes Station is located in downtown Åndalsnes. It is located at 4 meters (13 ft) above mean sea level and is 457 kilometers (284 mi) from Oslo Central Station.[5]" – these two sentences could be merged.
- M-m. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In the bibliography but with no citations: Hartmann et al.
- Hm, I guess that was because of a copy and paste from Bjorli Station. Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure that the isbn for Rauma kulturstyre is correct? It gives no results at neither GBooks, WorldCat nor Amazon.
- ISBN is correct, both according to the book and according to Bibsys. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The Bibsys entry also told me that Andreas Normann authored the book. Could he be added? --Eisfbnore ^talk 20:00, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No. As the book states, he gave his collection of sources and pictures to the public library in 1988 and died in 1990. The book is based on his archive (thus being part of Normann-samlingen) but is not authored by him. I agree that Bibsys hasn't quite noted this correctly, though. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:52, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Placing on hold. --Eisfbnore ^talk 17:26, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick review. All has been seen to. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good. I did a light spotcheck of the sources that were available online (I found the Rauma Line book at NB Digital – win

), and everything I looked at checked out. Passing. --Eisfbnore ^talk 20:00, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]