Talk:105th Guards Vienna Airborne Division

Military history: Russian & Soviet / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vienna in the article name[edit]

Buckshot06, you've renamed this article from 105th Guards Airborne Division and added a Vienna honorifics to the article name.

Do you find it a proper naming convention? In my opinion, it makes things too complicated and does not improve a reader's experience. Talking about complications, I mean it'd be great if all the articles had a unified approach to naming, but dozens (if not hundreds) of articles are not following now this rule about honorifics in name. --VoidWanderer (talk) 15:54, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I would prefer to stay consistent and not include honorifics as this is the only article with honorifics. Kges1901 (talk) 16:45, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to speedily delete a redirect that prohibits from moving the article now, but an admin had refused to delete it. --VoidWanderer (talk) 19:16, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can file a request for a non-controversial technical move at WP:RM#TR. Kges1901 (talk) 19:20, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]