Talk:1960 Democratic Party presidential primaries

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Florida[edit]

So did Florida have an election in 1960 or not?

--MathMan64 (talk) 04:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:PatBrown.jpg[edit]

The image Image:PatBrown.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

VP Nomination[edit]

Acc. to White (Making of the President 1960), no vote was taken for VP. The reason was that you had a bunch of delegates from the Upper Midwest screaming about his nomination, and Sam Rayburn (the convention chair) didn't want a divided vote. Thus he passed the nomination by UC (in spite of shouts of "no" from several parts of the hall). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.239.170.241 (talk) 04:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

White says (p. 212) that Kennedy announced Johnson as his choice at 4.30 pm. on July 14. He says nothing about delegates from the Upper Midwest, UC, Sam Rayburn or shouts of "no". Scolaire (talk) 11:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keeping Track of Surrogates[edit]

Ohio Governor Michael DiSalle for John F. Kennedy - [1]

Article[edit]

@-A-M-B-1996- Articles on primaries, as consensus has been, are limited to public contests. Most states pre-1972 did not hold such contests. Consensus has long been to outline public primaries in primary election articles.

Please avoid a triple revert and discuss before restoring. There is not consensus established to retain your edits merging the subject of primaries and conventions. The consensus at Wikipedia has been to have separate articles for primaries and conventions. SecretName101 (talk) 23:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not correct; please avoid strewing your discussion across several talk pages and relocate it to an appropriate venue. I am sure the 2020 or 2024 articles would be a good place for you to argue, in effect, that the Iowa caucuses should be removed from the infoboxes. -A-M-B-1996- (talk) 23:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

'


@Gelid Lagopus: Lyndon Johnson did not compete in the primaries. He famously waited until the Convention, after the primaries had concluded, to declare interest in the nomination. Your recent edit re-adding him actually misrepresents information and excludes the accurate context that he was not a candidate in the primary. I'd urge you to revert it and discuss. SecretName101 (talk) 18:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He also appeared on ballots in absolutely zero states. SecretName101 (talk) 18:24, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Gelid Lagopus are you not willing to discuss these points? SecretName101 (talk) 18:27, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If these points are not willing to be discussed, then the edit should be reverted. SecretName101 (talk) 02:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]