Talk:1995 India cyclone/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 21:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Hurricanehink. I will be reviewing this article to check if it's worthy of being listed among Wikipedia's Good articles. After a brief skim through, the article looks decent. But let me give it a more detailed look now.--12george1 (talk) 21:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

• "In November 1995, a tropical cyclone struck southeastern India and later spawned a rare snowstorm in Nepal," - Do you think you could link the 1995 North Indian Ocean cyclone season in here? Maybe at "November 1995"?

• I added a link in the next sentence. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

• "Reaching peak winds of at least 120 km/h (75 mph)," - What day did this happen?

• Added. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

• Why doesn't the MH mention the lowest minimum pressure?

• I'm not sure, but thanks for catching that, the IMD report was lower than what was listed! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

• I see that no warnings were issued in Nepal for the cyclone, but no preparations for India?

• Weirdly, it looks like the international press didn't pay much attention to the storm in India until it made landfall. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

• Speaking of India, no aftermath either?

• There rarely is aftermath for moderate impact storms in India, especially in the 90s w/o a ReliefWeb report. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

• " totals were 3000% of the average November rainfall" - Add a comma in "3000%"

• Done. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

So it was a pretty decent article after all. Nothing real significant. I just have these six issues that I need you to fix or address in a timely manner before I can list this article as a Good Article.--12george1 (talk) 21:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)