Talk:1997–98 Tennessee Lady Volunteers basketball team

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1997–98 Tennessee Lady Volunteers basketball team has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 4, 2007Good article nomineeListed
May 8, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
July 3, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Great article[edit]

I think this is a great article. I wish more people would create more articles like this. Anyway, I have a few suggestions. First, you might want to think about moving the page to a title like "1997-1998 Tennessee Lady Vols basketball team" or perhaps "1997-98 Tennessee Lady Vols basketball team". This will more accurately mimic standards created for sports teams done by other WikiProjects, most notably the Wikipedia:WikiProject College football. For examples, check here: 2007 NCAA Division I FBS football season#See also. Also, I would suggest you create a main Tennessee Lady Vols article, like the one I created for LSU. See: LSU Lady Tigers basketball. If any women's basketball team deserves its own article, then its definitely Tennessee. Seancp 13:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rating[edit]

I agree that this article is quite good. I have a few suggestions and then I would say to nominate it for good article status.

  • Some of the tables are a bit rough-looking, especially the Roster section, which shouldn't be in two rows of tables, any way you can compensate for the size of the table and make it fit would be great.
  • fix the refs, especially the ones in the headings. It makes the table of contents look unseemly. Just move them to the end of that section.
  • I love the prose style. It is quite good and very well referenced. Only thing needed is subheadings for each game (or set of games). As it is, the large blocks of prose are intimidating

Basically, most of what you have left is the easy stuff. The research and the writing is great. Just little technical problems. Wrad 03:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I got all this stuff done, so I'm nominating it. If I'm wrong, I can fix the stuff later anyway, so it's no big deal. Dlong 18:57, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps[edit]

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Lampman (talk) 13:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]