Talk:2010 United States House of Representatives elections in Pennsylvania

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pennsylvania's 7th congressional district election, 2010[edit]

Unless things suddenly change, I don't see any reason to have Pennsylvania's 7th congressional district election, 2010 as a separate article. The only thing missing is the debate schedule, I think. Flatterworld (talk) 02:30, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's a toss up election for an open seat. In additon, both candidates have pictures and they both raised a lot of money, making this district one of the most expensive the year.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 02:44, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I vote to keep this stand-alone article. This article has far more detail than the all-Pennsylvania article and, thus, is more useful to the public at large and voters in particular. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoosierhistorian (talkcontribs) 16:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge -- but (with all of the 2010 elections) tag {Recentism}/WP:RECENTISM. --S. Rich (talk) 16:08, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • I think it's worth keeping, although I'd like to see it expanded with more detail and further improved. In fact, I think individual articles about House races even more obscure than this would be fine, as long as they are strong articles that offer more than the brief District # descriptions at the general 2010 elections page. — Hunter Kahn 03:05, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm not sure why this has been tagged with WP:RECENTISM. As an article referring to an election that hasn't even happened yet it's unclear to me how the events that it describes could be anything but 'recent'. Blakkandekka (talk) 11:06, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on United States House of Representatives elections in Pennsylvania, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]