Talk:2014 Malmö FF season

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: Sweden / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Swedish football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Flags in footballbox templates[edit]

Hi 90.231.59.159, 2.65.139.118 and 81.237.241.67. Let me describe the issue about the flag icons in the footballbox templates. Wikipedia:MOSFLAG states that "Words as the primary means of communication should be given greater precedence over flags and flags should not change the expected style or layout of infoboxes or lists to the detriment of words." I've used flags in the pre-season section signify when the two clubs in a match are not from the same country as is praxis on Wikipedia. Since it is praxis to do so, the user will understand by default that when flags are omitted, that the two clubs are both Swedish. If in doubt, a simply click on either club will tell the user that the club is Swedish. Otherwise we would have to put Swedish flags in all the Allsvenskan and Svenska Cupen match boxes as well. The simple argument I make here is that we should try to avoid to use flags when we don't have to. Any argument like "I don't like it" should be avoided. Please discuss the issue here and present arguments that adhere to Wikipedia policy. If we can't reach a conclusion, I will request a third opinion. Also please try to avoid any personal attacks like you did previously. Thanks! --Reckless182 (talk) 11:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The request for a third opinion has been removed from the listing. (So this is not an "official" 3O response because we don't have a discussion.) I will say, however, that flag icons are discouraged in infoboxes. Also, uncivil language (whether in discussions or in edit pages) can lead to sanctions such as blocks from editing. – S. Rich (talk) 20:51, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've opened a discussion at the Administrators' noticeboard. Thanks! --Reckless182 (talk) 21:10, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on 2014 Malmö FF season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 38 external links on 2014 Malmö FF season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]