Talk:2021 Haitian migrant whip controversy

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.

Templates removed[edit]

This article was re-written to read less like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay stating the editor's personal feelings. User:Ray.lowry
This article is no longer an orphan, and has links to and from other Wikipedia pages User:Ray.lowry
Multiple Issue Templates were removed following the rule quoted below:User:Ray.lowry

You may remove a template when according to your best judgement the lack of edits and/or talk page discussion should be interpreted as the issue not worth fixing (as a form of "silent consensus"). Please note there is currently no consensus for general age-related removal of maintenance templates - that is, removing a template purely or chiefly because it is old is not considered a sufficient argument. Exception: removing POV-related templates whose discussions have gone dormant is encouraged, as addressed in the bullet point immediately above;

Renaming[edit]

I acted in good faith in both creating this page, and removing Multiple Issue Templates. I object to the name change. Typing the term “Whip Gate” into the search bar currently links to the renamed article, but how long will this last? And what of the five other pages that link to this article? User:Ray.lowry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.179.129.53 (talk) 18:40, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any objection to the page existing. I moved it to September 2021 Haitian migrant photo controversy both because Whip Gate was less neutral, and because I didn't see evidence of it being widely used in reliable sources. The links from other pages will be automatically fixed by a bot. Ganesha811 (talk) 18:44, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bullshit[edit]

This article is complete bullshit without the photo in question. Somebody needs to add the photo, or delete this article. 73.131.102.159 (talk) 14:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good start. I marked as reviewed. Happy editing..

North8000 (talk) 19:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice work.

North8000 (talk) 17:42, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Split reins controversy" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Split reins controversy and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 15#Split reins controversy until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Whip Gate - Incidents During the Biden Administration" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Whip Gate - Incidents During the Biden Administration and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 24#Whip Gate - Incidents During the Biden Administration until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:45, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]