Talk:2021 in heavy metal music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

RfC about Gemini Syndrome[edit]

The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

This RfC has not attracted enough participation to reach a reliable consensus, so there are no actionable conclusions from it.—S Marshall T/C 15:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If Gemini Syndrome is talking about releasing their third album, can it not be listed under "Artists with material in production" at 2021 in heavy metal music? It is more than likely that the album will be released some time in 2021, and even if it does not, it can be moved to "2022 in heavy metal music". Jax 0677 (talk) 02:56, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is too early for a full-blown thirty-day formal RfC, see WP:RFCBEFORE. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - I started a discussion here. --Jax 0677 (talk) 03:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I restarted the RFC, because WP:HMM and WP:DR did not pick up steam. --Jax 0677 (talk) 03:12, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you try WT:MUSICIAN? I see that Walter Görlitz (talk · contribs) has posted that articles ignore WP:NOTNEWS and list that bands are writing new songs for an upcoming album; have started to work with a producer in pre-production; plan to enter the studio shortly; have entered the studio to record work; have completed recording; have sent a recording to mixing or mastering; have completed artwork for a cover; have sent the work to be pressed; or worst yet, have opened a crowdfunding campaign for the new work. Just because you find WP:FANCRUFT like this, does not mean it should be added to other articles nor that it should be left in existing articles, even when sourced using WP:SECONDARY sources. We are attempting to write about lasting, notable and encyclopedic events and content, not every thing that happens to a band or performer, not is in some way associated with the subject. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've been pinged and quoted.

This list seems to be an exception to a lot of rules. It predicts the future in claiming that works will be released on specific dates when we know that delays always happen. It also speculates on what bands may actually be doing in the studio. However, since this already exists, as long as it has a solid reference, I don't see why it (and the other fan cruft) can't continue here. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:10, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - The Raising has been identified as the album title per [1]. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Heart Healer[edit]

@TheSickBehemoth: I didn't understand why the project not having an article is a reason not to add the album (especially when the project's owner does have one). Could you please point me the guideline/discussion that established such limitation? Victor Lopes ^Fala!•C 15:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]