This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Splitting off the discussion on Ceriy's talk page, I wanted to ask if perhaps listing the titles (in the infobox) in the most recent to oldest order would be more natural for a reader? So rather than starting out with the 1940 division, the title immediately gives the most current version and then traces back the history of the unit's titles? Aside from this, Buckshot06 has proposed a great idea on how to include all the historical titles.--Riurik(discuss) 16:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please see Ceriy's talk page - the example I'm following is there. Buckshot06 (talk) 22:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
