Talk:9M119 Svir/Refleks

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 9M119 Svir/Refleks article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Soviet Union: Military Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force.

Say what?[edit]

Can somebody include a translation of the name(s)? TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 09:10, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citation[edit]

There is no citation for the armor penetration value given by the article. My sources say 700-750mm in RHAe, minus 50mm for conventional ERA. That is a big difference and a relevant one. The article is basically good but probably too arcane for layman. Jon Chin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.225.71.63 (talk) 12:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Svir vs Releks[edit]

Reflex was older and extremely costly (only used for T-80s) and thus they developed svir for T-72s which was much cheaper, lacked automization unit 9S517, target acqizition unit 9C536. Svir uses 1K13 "Neman", which has 4km range and does not allow to shoot while moving. I'd go so far as suggesting splitting article in two, weapons are related in function but that's it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.112.108.225 (talk) 09:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 9M119. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]