Talk:Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Irish Independent article[edit]

In that article that is given as the source does it actually say that they were associates of O'Snodaigh? Exiledone (talk) 15:16, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, they don't, but this one does say they were associated with Sinn Fein in O Snodaigh's constituency. I'll update the article. Snappy (talk) 15:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Someone deleted the following section - In October 2002, five men associated with Sinn Féin in Snodaigh's constituency[3] were arrested after discovery of a van in County Wicklow containing a sledgehammer, a black balaclava, a pickaxe handle, two-way radios, and a fluorescent jacket with the word "Garda" on it, along with election posters reading 'Sinn Féin No 1 Aengus Ó Snodaigh'. In a nearby Nissan Almera (with false numberplates) they found a blue flashing beacon, a stun gun, a canister of CS gas and a roll of masking tape.[4][5]

I've restored it. Might be worth watching this article coming up to the election date. Féasógach (talk) 19:43, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The section appears to be present more for the suggestion that Aengus Ó Snodaigh is linked than anything else. I also notice every source for it is from indepedent.ie, is there any particular reason for that? IRWolfie- (talk) 00:21, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've added another source, this one from RTÉ. Snappy (talk) 19:25, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This source further shows a lack of evidence of involvement. Wikipedia isn't a rumour mill. (Anyone can carry a poster) IRWolfie- (talk) 10:52, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Have to agree with Wolfie here. If a person is arrested for drink driving and happens to have a Fianna Fáil sticker on their car should it go in their WIki article? Methinks not. There's no proof evidence knew these individuals and the section should be removed. --CommieMark (talk) 17:28, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bad photo[edit]

This photo seems to be pretty bad, are there no others available? IRWolfie- (talk) 00:12, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aengus Ó Snodaigh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aengus Ó Snodaigh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:33, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Material relating to third parties removed from this biography of a living person[edit]

Following the discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive308#Aengus Ó Snodaigh which although brief was advertised here, I have removed information following the reply of "controversial material about non-notable third parties shouldn't be on a BLP at all, no". FDW777 (talk) 20:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not much of a discussion at all. I agree that material about his wife, sister/sister-in-law, children should be removed but not the Leinster House spy ring. These people were employees in Ó Snodaigh office. Ó Snodaigh later publicly defended these people. It would be a pretty shabby article if it didn't mention this incident. See Michael Healy-Rae's article for info that appears about incidents in a TD's office. Spleodrach (talk) 13:06, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There was a discussion, properly advertised. If people ignore it, that's their concern. I've included the spy ring details in the existing sentence about election workers, seems the most reasonable place since Ó Snodaigh has not been accused or convicted of wrongdoing. FDW777 (talk) 14:03, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There wasn't a discussion is any sense of the word, and it wasn't properly advertised. It should have been mentioned here or at WT:IE, as not everyone watches BLP noticeboard. Spleodrach (talk) 10:53, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It was mentioned here. FDW777 (talk) 10:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]