Talk:All for Nothing?

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Television Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian television.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 15:50, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All For Nothing? → All for Nothing? – Since this is a television series, it should be moved per MOS:CT. Aspects (talk) 14:46, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree – This is the only article titled All For Nothing?. Bob Mono (talk) 21:16, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support No need for a discussion, when it's used as a preposition, "for" should never be capitalised. Unreal7 (talk) 16:41, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose & Support & Question - (Am a little confused) 1st thought reading the request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Current discussions: How are you applying MOS:CT to this? Then come here and saw the requested change is different. I agree with removing the cap from "for", but disagree with removing "(TV Show)".--Education does not equal common sense. 我不在乎 20:36, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The question mark is disambiguation enough. e.g. Where Is the Love and Where Is the Love?. Unreal7 (talk) 22:24, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Heck, even capitalization can be considered adequate disambiguation. Marcus Qwertyus 10:07, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.