Talk:Allegiance (Firewind album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Allegiance (Firewind album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Article requirements:


Green tickY Start: A reasonably complete infobox
   Green tickY B: Complete with cover art and most technical details
Green tickY Start: A lead section giving an overview of the album
   Green tickY B: At least one other section of prose
Green tickY Start: A track listing
   Green tickY B: Containing track lengths and authors for all songs
Green tickY Start: A list of personnel
   Green tickY B: Full list, including technical personnel and guest musicians
Green tickY Start: Categorisation at least by artist and year

==Re-assessment== Start class:

  • Green tickY A reasonably complete infobox
  • Green tickY A lead section giving an overview of the album
  • Green tickY A track listing
  • Green tickY Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
  • Green tickY Categorisation at least by artist and year

C class:

  • Green tickY All the start class criteria
  • Green tickY A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
  • Green tickY At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  • Green tickY A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  • Green tickY A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.

B class:

  • Green tickY All the C class criteria
  • Green tickY A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  • Green tickY A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  • Red XN No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
  • Green tickY No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS
Good job! My only complaint is that the review for Kerrang is uncited and the citations from the Firewind website are good except the links at the bottom don't look to the page, in fact, they aren't links at all! I think that can be fixed. Update these and it can be moved up to a B class. Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:48, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:07, 6 July 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 07:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)