Talk:Alliance of Baptists

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Baptist World Alliance[edit]

The Alliance of Baptists ist not a member body of the Baptist Worl Alliance; look: http://www.baptistworldalliance.org/Contact%20Us/MemberBodies.htm ! Gregor Helms [Unsigned comment by User:84.129.129.52 06:37, 11 October 2006]

Bias[edit]

Just for the record, I am now monitoring this article for bias. It is fairly obvious that a few people with an ax to grind have been editing this to frame the Alliance's stances on accepting homosexuals and ordaining women in ways that suit their needs, and not the needs of truthful encyclopedic content. Sighter Goliant 18:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alliance of Baptists. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:42, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]