Talk:Appalachian Development Highway System

United States: West Virginia Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	West Virginia portal This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as High-importance).

U.S. Roads Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Appalachian Development Highway System is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Appalachia B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Table of contents[edit]

It was on the right for some reason, and it was messing up the infoboxes which were being pushed way down past the sections they referred to. For now, the table on contents has the word "show". If anyone knows a better solution please suggest it.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Appalachian Development Highway System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Appalachian Development Highway System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:03, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Corridor lengths[edit]

Some of the listed corridor lengths are at, at a glance, obviously wrong. It's not 13.1 miles from Lucasville, OH to Columbus, OH or 9.4 miles from Jackson to Chillicothe. WV posts mile markers for its ARC Corridors and one a bit south of I-79 is MM 68.5 [1], so the listed mileage for Corridor L isn't right either.

ActivBowser9177 needs to provide citations, and the ones he posted on my talk page aren't sufficient [2] and I question the distance he's listed, but the currently cited table is clearly not accurate. Bitmapped (talk) 02:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

At issue is not that the roads exist, but do they meet both ADHS eligibility and standards. To confirm this we need references that conclude they do, usually by the Appalachian Regional Commission. Our current resource dates from 2013; here is the most current ADHS Status Report, as of September 30, 2016. Reviewing it now, corridor C shows a total length of 71.7 miles, but only 13.1 miles qualify for ADHS funding; corridor L shows a total length of 69.9 miles, but only 60.5 miles qualify for ADHS funding. Our mileages have been based on eligibility, but if we going to switch to corridor, we will likely need to revise most on the page using the most recent reference. Please share opinions. --WashuOtaku (talk) 05:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the corridors' length needs to be updated. We should just put corridor length. Corridor C is 71.7 miles, and the miles of eligibility is 13.1. I tried experimenting putting both the miles for ADHS funding and corridor length, but I never saw the eligibility length. The way you calculate the corridor length in multiple states is adding the total length of the corridor in each state. If Corridor B is 305.5 miles in eligibility length, it is likely it is not the real length. Adding the total lengths in each state, I calculated a 318-mile corridor. Sure, we can put the eligibility length in the text to make the readers not too confused, but we should change the lengths to corridor length. ActivBowser9177 (talk) 01:43, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with using the full mileage of the corridor rather than mileage eligible for ADHS funding. The infoboxes just say length, with no qualification, so I think readers are going to reasonably assume the length shown is the distance between the listed corridor endpoints. Right now, it's not. Changing to corridor length would resolve this issue. Bitmapped (talk) 02:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Appalachian Development Highway System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]