Talk:Ashuri script

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"...it is called Ashuri, is because it is an "Enriched" (from the word Osher) text" This is incorrect. The author is confusing the world 'osher (with a 'ayin) with the word osher (with an aleph). Hence, the sentence should read:

"...it is called Ashuri, is because it is "fortunate" (from the world Osher) text" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhayat (talkcontribs) 00:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merging with ktav stam[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result was do not merge into Ktav Stam. -- DarkCrowCaw 15:10, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this article should be merged, because Ashuri alphabet stands as a unique historical phenomenon from the time of the Mishna. Articles discussing the history of middle-eastern scripts link specifically to this article.Jimhoward72 (talk) 08:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Aramaic script[edit]

So this script descends from the Aramaic script correct? And most scholars believe all the scripts of the Levant go back to the Proto-Sinaitic script.Historylover4 (talk) 06:51, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, basically "Ashuri" is the original Jewish term to refer to the Aramaic (Imperial Aramaic) letters which became the Hebrew letters used today. These letters were "Ashuri" ("Assyrian") - in other words, borrowed from Imperial Aramaic - apparently to distinguish them from the original paleo-Hebrew alphabet which the letters replaced.Jimhoward72 (talk) 22:29, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]