Talk:Autoacceleration

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polymers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PolymersWikipedia:WikiProject PolymersTemplate:WikiProject PolymersPolymers articles

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I am aware this page is not formatted correctly. This is my first article (actually an interesting assignment from a professor) and I am limited by time constraints. This page does have proper sourcing, it just needs to be cleaned up. Seeandyspin (talk) 15:30, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Hazardous polymerization into Autoacceleration[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge into Autoacceleration. -- DarkCrow^Caw 18:21, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

These two topics both deal with the same phenomenon. Autoacceleration is how is it generally described and would be the preferred article name. Also, the autoacceleration article is better developed. ChemGardener (talk) 01:19, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. --Aushulz (talk) 00:17, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also agree. By the way, I think the lede of this article needs to be written in a way that is a little more accessible to the casual reader (i.e. one with little knowledge of chemistry). 85.228.208.58 (talk) 11:23, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and the title "Hazardous polymerization" does not give proper information about the content of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.240.81.123 (talk) 19:08, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.