Talk:Back end of line

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Too much random data[edit]

The first two paragraphs are good, they explain what BEOL means. The rest of the article is just a collection of trivia without organization. Having a section that explains how the number of layers has grown over the years could certainly be useful, but it shouldn't just be a random selection of chips that isn't even listed in historical order. Compare with the matching FEOL article.

Several statements seem utter nonsense: "As of 2011, many commercial processes support 2 or 3 metal layers". That is only true in the sense that in 2011 most cars could go 25 km/h. 2 or 3 layers was the late 80s to early 90s. In 2011, 6 to 12 layers was more likely, and in 2016 new processes have 10 to 15 layers. 2602:306:CEAE:E60:6020:C6EA:9A5D:7051 (talk) 20:46, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I removed this sentence, since the link is dead and the site was commercial anyway. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Back end of line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:03, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]