Talk:Back to Base X

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Back to Base X is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Rock music

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Verfifcation[edit]

User:QuietHere: What needs more verification? What do you doubt about? Thanks for hints. --Krächz (talk) 15:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Krächz: There are several statements made in this article, such as the genre, studios where the album was recorded, and especially "The album was well received," in the lead, etc., that need references to external sources to know they're accurate. Plus external sources to get more info, like a more-specific release date, would also be great to have here. QuietHere (talk) 15:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I doubled, tripled and quatrupled the sources, so every single sentence has a reference now. The lead normally is a conclusion of the following article and needs no further verification. Are the two reviews I used in "style" and "reception" not a "well" recievement? Otherwise I have to delete the sentence from the lead, that is no big deal. If you want further information, feel free to add. A template for verification is not the right tool to expand an article, I guess. --Krächz (talk) 16:01, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Krächz: Couldn't think of an answer one way or another in regards to your question myself, so I posed it here. Please add any input you may have. QuietHere (talk) 15:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My English isn't that good to joint the discussion, but definitely WP:Synth is relevant for our question, so no more contradiction. en-Wiki seems to be stricter in this topic than de-Wiki. --Krächz (talk) 22:45, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]