Talk:Behemoth (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hardcore fans[edit]

hardcore fans, those are fans that listen to hardcore, right? That's poorly worded. Dawhitfield 14:59, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~Hmmm...no. Hardcore could be like....Intensely loyal, die-hard fans of the 'old' Behemoth who were dissapointed by the change that the band underwent and therefore felt that the band had 'sold out'...something like that? I don't really think it's relevant to Hardcore music.

It's obvious that it refers to what the person above me said. It's easy to distinguish between the two especially since the band have nothing to do with the Hardcore scene. --Xdiabolicalx 19:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Satanic?[edit]

Is this band vaguely Satanic? (Uta 18:59, 25 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]

For lack of a better term, yes. The band is based around Pagan beliefs, but they do have a pretty considerable amount of Satanic references and references to religious texts (The Apostasy inner sleeve featured a quote from the Hymn to Lucifer by Aleister Crowley). So, yes, vaguely Satanic is probably the most accurate statement. Mister Deranged 23:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well this band is definitely anti-christian, like most other bands in the extreme metal scene. Bopash4 03:54, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, they worship money first and foremost. In seriousness, though, they're pretty much just occultists who take "beliefs" from everything. --Korey Kaczynski 06:53, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Behemoth - well, at least Nergal himself - practice Thelema, the occult belief spearheaded by Aleister Crowley in the 20th Century. Crowley himself in turn, borrowed from other religions in his attacks on Christianity (for instance, both Set (Egyptian) and Baphomet are deities in Thelema, and he reffered to himself as 'the Beast'), just as Behemoth do. - Dark Prime

Fair use rationale for Image:Behemoth-logo.png[edit]

Image:Behemoth-logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:10, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I FIXED THIS ONE TOO LEAVE ME ALONE BOTS :'( = ∫ tc 5th Eye 05:37, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard chart[edit]

Apparently their new album broke into the top 200 recently, entering in at #146. Perhaps we need one of those chart tables?—arf! 23:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Behemoth-logo.png[edit]

Image:Behemoth-logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added section.[edit]

I added a section about the controversy with regards to their alleged banning in their home country due to a certain organization. If anyone feels that this can be improved, please feel free too add.

-- ShadowCreatorII (talk) 20:16, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New label[edit]

Behemoth recently have signed contracts with Metal Blade Records and Nuclear Blast Records —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.199.198.237 (talk) 15:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blackened death?[edit]

I don't know much about Behemoth, I admit, but I'm pretty sure the stuff they play now sounds to me like death metal pretty much. Very little black metal influence. They still have that imagery but as far as I know, they don't play black metal anymore. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 00:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blackened death. The black metal influence has more to do with their lyrics than anything else. That's why it is blackened death metal and not death metal. Bradman3001 (talk) 00:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then they shouldn't be blackened death! Yes, they use black metal imagery and lyrics (somewhat) but that doesn't make them blackened death metal. It has to be the music. Like Angelcorpse or almost any early Scandinavian black metal band. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 22:02, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually a lot of genre categorization reaches beyond just musical elements. However, it's really useless to argue these things, considering how much bands change over time. Yeah they aren't purely death, and they aren't purely black (not enough symphonic sounds and atmosphere in my opinion), but really, no one cares except the people who associate themselves with such labels. If genres are debated, I don't see why Wikipedia doesn't just list them all, thus showing that a band has elements of certain ones, and are not restricted to one sound (since most bands don't sound the same one album to the next). Btw, The Apostasy is very black (i.e. anti-christian). --Notmyhandle (talk) 08:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Listing all possible genres on a band's infobox would create serious edit warring. Anti-Christianity in lyrics doesn't make an album one genre or another. Black metal is about a sound (one that Behemoth doesn't seem to display anymore) not lyrics. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 21:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Black metal elements in Behemoth's music have nearly disappeared, they are clearly not worth listing Behemoth as Black metal or Blackened death metal. I think if the band had no past in Black metal no one would even think about characterizing them as Blackened death metal. Nor should the satanism thing be a reason to identify them as black. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.127.105.98 (talk) 16:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PoV[edit]

So i don't know shit about editing and stuff like that, but i know bad writing. This is THE most biased thing ive ever read about a band. this is so not-PoV safe. can someone edit this? it looks like Behemoths publicity crew wrote it!

I agree. This page is lacking a neutral point of view. It also makes a number of sweeping generalized commenrts like how they helped influence the entire Polish Metal underground, how this album or that album are the "ultimate one" in respected genre, etc. I love Behemoth, but I hate bias. :P 24.224.229.101 (talk) 00:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation[edit]

I don't think it is pronounced like in the audio file. If you listen to Ezkaton, at the beginning of "From the Pagan Vastlands" (live) you hear Nergal saying 'Behemoth'. While you can hardly hear the 't' in the audio file, it sounds like a normal 't' from Nergal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.127.105.98 (talk) 16:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I Changed Some Things...[edit]

I just removed a statement in the opening section of the article. It was between the first and (now) second sentences.

What I removed was this:
"Behemoth is the Polish word for "Lol"."

I am very sure that this was inaccurate; for one thing they do not cite a reference. Another thing is I am pretty sure that Behemothactually has a different meaning.

Also, I changed the link of "Decapitated" to "Decapitated (band). The "Decapitated" link lead to "Decapitation," the definition of the removal of heads. Jackhatte (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about explaining edits like this. The 'lol' comment was blatant vandalism, and disambiguating a link like that is standard fare. Keep it up! Just remember - as per WP:NOTBROKEN, do not fix redirects that aren't broken. Your last edit doesn't violate this, as you changed the link to avoid a disambig page.--King ♣ Talk 12:50, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox image[edit]

Maybe I don't understand something here but the current image in the infobox is promotional and free images should be used instead. Though what I don't understand is the permission the image has and if this is still appropriate for Wikipedia. The image that should be used instead is this: File:Behemoth Paris 17-02-2008 05.jpg FireCrystal (talk) 05:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reconstruction[edit]

All right, I'd love to reconstruct this page- I won't be able to start until tomorrow, but I certainly appreciate anyone who wants to help. This article needs to be rewritten in a much more objective tone. Let's fix it up so it doesn't have that template over it. Mønster av Arktisk Vinter Kvelden (talk) 00:40, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Albums[edit]

There are 2 albums missing the Chaotica ones. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.246.244.228 (talk) 03:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Misinformation[edit]

His wife wasn't a match, but it's not advanced to the point where chemo is worthless. http://www.metalinjection.net/latest-news/behemoth-bassist-offers-update-nergals-leukemia 108.15.17.159 (talk) 18:26, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1991 the year of formation?[edit]

Are you sure about that year or at least have a source to back it up? Because not only do I find it hard to believe that this band actually began before Gorgoroth, but also that a 14 year old fronted a black metal band on guitar and vocals. • GunMetal Angel 11:50, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's stated here and in many other interviews, also on their official website etc. --6Anesthesia (talk) 22:08, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About Seth[edit]

This always kind of bugged me, but maybe one of you guys know the answer to this question. Why is Seth consistently credited as a session member? He has been with the band since the Demigod album, up to their latest album Evangelion and as far as I know he has been since with them at every studio session, rehearsal, every tour and so on. He clearly isn't just some session member and would actually be more a band member. Does anybody know what's up with this? Resilldoux (talk) 09:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know about him, but there are other bands with musicians who are considered session members but used for a longer period. --217/83 14:51, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

B-class review[edit]

Quickfailed: unreferenced paragraphs, sentences. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:28, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Behemoth (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Behemoth (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:52, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Behemoth_(band)&oldid=1206220631"